Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Saville, Lee Travis, Souter And Now Gambaccini
Can anyone spot the common denominator?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Once you start trying to define "perversion" you are on dangerous and unwholesome ground. Laws generally aren't made to comat such an idea.
I actually don't think you can be prosecuted for breaking a law which now no longer exists. I may be wrong.
So presumably the charge is more serious. I hope not, because Gambo strikes me as one of the good guys.
I actually don't think you can be prosecuted for breaking a law which now no longer exists. I may be wrong.
So presumably the charge is more serious. I hope not, because Gambo strikes me as one of the good guys.
In general, I don't think you can be prosecuted under a law that no longer exists, in that the idea behind it is no longer valid. Hence you couldn't be prosecuted for being a petty chapman wandering abroad. But you could be for revenue offences because illegally avoiding tax is still a crime, and it wouldn't matter if your not doing something which you were then required to do, but which now you are not because of some change in therevenue law, came to light.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.