ChatterBank4 mins ago
Saville, Lee Travis, Souter And Now Gambaccini
Can anyone spot the common denominator?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Agree about Gambaccini, if what is claimed is true. The CPS would never think the man should be charged because of an offence contrary to a law which was widely disliked and which has now been abolished. It is not in he public interest. It's doubtful whether to do so is constitutional, as the Americans would say, even if technically possible, it offends our principles of justice. Whatever next? Prosecuting somebody for blasphemy ?Or being a petty chapman wandering abroad without giving a good account of himself[contrary to the same act, the Vagrancy Act, which gave us the 'sus law']?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.