Sorry for the delay folks but Christmas preps and another thread have kept me occupied.
First I am a true-Brit and believe in a United States of Europe, unlike our politicians or most of you, I have no strong pro- or anti-feelings re Russia or the USA although I recognise the pluses and minuses of both - again unlike yourselves who see Russia as an evil state. I'll now respond in turn:
(a) Jake. Nope I did not know about the negotiations with USA re an open market. But I never knew that the USA were talking with Syria. Anyway, Jake, interstate and international talks go on everywhere. There is no way the USA would do a 100% even-stephen deal with the EU. It is pure
pie-in-the-sky thinking. The USA have open access to the EU and wouldn't do a fair deal - ask the Canadians who made that mistake.
(b) Modeller re WW2. I condemn the invasions you cite. I won't go into Poland's history as an independent state (part of Germany before the disastrous Versaille Treaty which facilitated Hitler's rise). I recognise Poland as an indepedent state but on a different thread many would be whining about Poles stealing our jobs and money - rubbish of course.
Anyway by design or accident the Russo-German Treaty allowed the Russians vital time to build tanks and other armaments to defeat the Germans. By the way for 1 year after declaring war we did nothing aggressive and the USA remained aloof until Pearl Harbour (neutality is very much akin to a non-agression treaty).
(c)Hypo: The Russian invasion of Afghanistan was not imperialistic but fear of the Iranian Ayatolla's maniacal desire to spread Islamic fundementalism. Exactly the same as the UK/USA reason. Russia has more muslims than the USA and they were afraid, like us, of the infection spreading via Afghanistan. But the Russians lost so many troops they were forced by Public Opinion (some dictatorship hey?) to surrender to the Taliban, just as we will.
I don't want to pursue this any further but will still read and maybe respond to your posts.
Kind Regards,
SIQ.