Donate SIGN UP

Now They Are Reviewing Sentence......

Avatar Image
ToraToraTora | 15:32 Wed 26th Feb 2014 | News
35 Answers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-26354079
How long should the savage get?
How long should the savage actually serve in one of HM holiday camps?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 35rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
/in one of HM holiday camps? /

OP credibility failure before it even starts
10 years, he punched the man with no provocation, just because he remonstrated with the cyclist, i doubt that will happen, but i would - he is a violent thug.
What makes them holiday camps? Because they are locked up with 3 meals a day...yada yada...
Question Author
Ok to those who want to start a separate discussion on the punitive abilities of our penatentiaries feel free.

On the subject in question I think he should be incarcerated for at least 10 years, yes it's manslaughter but this case has is a particulary nasty feel to it. The guy intended to do damage simply because his mate was "dissed" for riding on the pavement. The guy is a danger to the public and should be locked up in a proper prison but I suppose I'll have to settle fo one of ours.
Hopefully 10 years, but he won't serve the full 10 will he ?
Looks like you've rattled the right-on liberals TTT!

25 years. It was a deliberate attack but I expect we will see s*d all extra.

And those that dished out the sentence should be removed from the court process.


We are encouraging a lawless society by this sort of sentence and the cushy prisons (words of some ex-cons) we have in this country.

the nasty country? the plain daft country seems more appropriate no wonder the Scots want free of us.
Question Author
In that case give him 20, he should be in jail for 10 years, I don't care what the Lord longford appreciation society actually sentence him to.
according to the news i was looking at, it only has to take one complaint for it to be looked into. I will see if i can find that link again.
i read through the piece, i understand, but the severity of the punch, it was loaded, a boxer couldn't have done more damage, the man fell backwards with considerable force, going on the footage, smashed his head, if it was a shove, a tap even then likely he would got up with his dignity in bits, but largely unscathed, as it was the man punched him with his body weight behind, he could have killed him outright, causing massive brain damage, before he hit the deck. I think that 4 years is appallingly lenient.
Perhaps he should get what that copper who killed Ian Tomlinson got.

What was that?

10 years?
Question Author
That was not an efficient punch, nothing like a boxer or martial artist it was basically a hay maker, came from well behind and hit hard hard enough to knock him out cold and thus hit his head on the ground. A Gyakazuki for example uses the hip twist, this guy did none of that. Added to that the victim was not a fit stong bloke and had slow reactions. Not only that he sent a telegram before he punched, did you also see where his head finished up? If he tried that on me I'd have used a left hand soto uke, followed by a right hand gyakazuki and a low kakomi to his left knee, game over.
Should get at least 20 yrs I'd say.
no idea why you think bringing that into the post, but in case it's another dig at the police, i don't know what happened to the officer, i doubt if he got ten years, perhaps he should have,

whilst the man who punched this chap is quite clearly shown hauling back then letting fly. Malice, intent, and execution.
having attended any number of boxing matches, you may be right, but i have watched amateur and professional, and they don't generally hold back, this chap didn't, he let fly with full force.
Question Author
said anything about holding back?
TTT, not sure what you mean, but this was an unfit individual, standing there, not with hands raised or with intent on causing the cyclist any harm, it was the man with him who did this, all because the chap had remonstrated with the cyclist on the dangers of cycling on the pavement
Question Author
sorry I'm, not sure what you meant buy "they don't usually hold back" - who said anything about boxers etc holding back?
TTT

If you were going to punch someone, would you not use your best punch.

I'm not condoning this bloke in any way. But I have a question. Have you ever hit someone?

Hard?

Outside a boxing match I mean.

Do you remember the two cage fighters who were walking outside a nightclub and got hassled by a bloke because they were in fancy dress as women?

Well, one of the cage fighters gave the bloke a bunch of fives...and he scuttled away.

However, what if he has fallen wrong and hit his head and died?

It takes sheer bad luck to turn someone from 'a bit of a hero' into a savage.

Also, it helps if...well, you know...
just watching the footage, this was with malice, he was not holding back, whether it was a haymaker, it was a full on punch, landed on a man who was not in any way expecting it, so might have been able to move out the way. the case is now under review, who knows, they might give him another six months.

1 to 20 of 35rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Now They Are Reviewing Sentence......

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.