I think the implication is that the Telegraph has lifted the story from the Sunday Times a couple of weeks earlier, though of course there could be a new development.
Jim, whilst the article implies that the Times carried the initial reports, it makes it clear that since then the school has been to be placed on special measures by the Government’s education watchdog. There doesn’t seem to be any doubt that the allegations made several weeks ago are now being taken seriously.
I'd noticed, which is why it doesn't deal with it: even taking that press release to scotch the Telegraph's report you're left with the Daily Mail's that's a separate story, separate school etc.
The press release doesn't scotch the Telegraph's report. That was issued several weeks before the school was placed on special measures and the Telegraph published the story.
As for the rest of your post, I have no idea what you're talking about. I've just said it's a different school.
1. The press release I posted is only relevant to the Telegraph Report.
2. Because the Daily Mail Report is about a different school.
3. On the other hand the Press Release is dated a couple of weeks before and maybe things have changed.
I noticed all of this, and so have you, so we are actually in agreement.
Well, actually, no, we are not entirely in agreement. The press release was clearly issued weeks before the allegations were officially investigated. Therefore, things have certainly changed. No question about that.
Well, if you say so. But you didn't really need to point out repeatedly that the Daily Mail report is about a different school. I certainly noticed that.