News1 min ago
Should This Guy Be Working Again?
50 Answers
http:// www.bbc .com/ne ws/uk-e ngland- birming ham-270 39627
I'm not sure myself, clearly he's a talented surgeon and his services are needed but his "prank" was a bit out of order.
I'm not sure myself, clearly he's a talented surgeon and his services are needed but his "prank" was a bit out of order.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Yes, apparently he's a skilled surgeon so it's a complete waste keeping him out of his profession.
If it could have potentially damaged the liver then I'd understand, but apparently it doesn't..."Liver surgeons use an argon beam to stop livers bleeding, but can also use it to burn the surface of the liver to sketch out the area of an operation."
If it could have potentially damaged the liver then I'd understand, but apparently it doesn't..."Liver surgeons use an argon beam to stop livers bleeding, but can also use it to burn the surface of the liver to sketch out the area of an operation."
Of course he should be back at work. He caused no harm to the patient. Yes, it may have been a bit silly of him, but if such a talented surgeon had saved my life then he/she could carve their initials on my backside and I wouldn't complain.
He really should have just received a slap on the wrist and this matter should never have come to the public eye.
He really should have just received a slap on the wrist and this matter should never have come to the public eye.
A difficult one to call. His "prank" illustrates a very arrogant/callous attitude to his patients and a degree of irresponsibility unwelcome in a senior surgeon.
On the other hand you don't want to cut off the nose to spite the face, so some appropriate disciplinary action is required not involving sacking.
On the other hand you don't want to cut off the nose to spite the face, so some appropriate disciplinary action is required not involving sacking.
I agree with ludwig and woofgang. A very arrogant and creepy thing to do. I hope he sees the error of his ways. He`s lucky that the cost of his training probably makes it worthwhile keeping him employed because if this was a hapless supermarket employee defacing the baked bean tins they would be sacked. One rule for one..