Donate SIGN UP

Skull Cracker On The Run

Avatar Image
mikey4444 | 06:44 Mon 05th May 2014 | News
23 Answers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-27280228

Am is missing something here ?

This thug at the Old Bailey, in 2002, received 13 life sentences for robbery and 13 concurrent five-year sentences for possessing an imitation firearm. The judge said that he must serve at least 8 years He has now walked out of a open prison, because somebody let him out !

Its difficult to know where to start here, but why, if he was given 13 life sentences and 13 five-year sentences, did the Judge say that he should serve a minimum of 8 years ? If the Judge thinks that he only deserved 8 years, what was the point of all those life sentences ? And why was he allocated to an open prison ?

The mind boggles !
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 23 of 23rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Avatar Image
Of course none of us knows the details of “Skullcrusher’s” offences (and those details would heavily influence the sentence). But this has nothing to do with “Human Rights”. It is a result of sentencing policy devised by the supposedly independent Sentencing Council who issue guidelines by which judges and magistrates are bound. This...
10:53 Mon 05th May 2014
// Quite how somebody who had gone AWOL before can be “…reasonably trusted not to try to escape” is a little curious to say the least. //

They obviously asked him if he'd try to escape again and he promised he not to.
Mikey, if you're missing something, then so am I. I give up.
So within a day of escaping he holds up a building society allegedly. So much for rehabilitation and being prepared for release.
Pathetic

21 to 23 of 23rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Skull Cracker On The Run

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.