Quizzes & Puzzles6 mins ago
Oh It's All So Easy
41 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-26 26142/J ailed-1 5-month s-The-c urry-ho use-own er-fals ely-cla imed-41 -000-be nefits- burkha- wearing -wife-b uy-desi gner-cl othes.h tml
How do some manage to swindle our benefit system, when those who have more need to these benefits find it very difficult, if not impossible?
How do some manage to swindle our benefit system, when those who have more need to these benefits find it very difficult, if not impossible?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ./It would be like buying a Lamborghini and keeping it permanently in the garage with the door closed. /
You obviously don't know the insurance restrictions on classic cars aog
I have a friend with a vintage Rolls Royce (it used to belong to Brian Jones of The Rolling Stones)
and he keeps it in his garage and drives a Honda most days
You obviously don't know the insurance restrictions on classic cars aog
I have a friend with a vintage Rolls Royce (it used to belong to Brian Jones of The Rolling Stones)
and he keeps it in his garage and drives a Honda most days
//But surely 'burkha wearing wife' is in the headline in the Daily Mail? So it's pertinent to the story ...... //
The point is that what she wears is irrelevant - just like a nuns outfit would be irrelevant - so why include/ draw attention to it in the headline .
What they did was obviously against the law - whether she goes around in public , wearing her preferred form of attire or not
The point is that what she wears is irrelevant - just like a nuns outfit would be irrelevant - so why include/ draw attention to it in the headline .
What they did was obviously against the law - whether she goes around in public , wearing her preferred form of attire or not
i'm not on any soapbox - you've clearly not read what i've previously said with regards to aog .
My comment was relating to headline in the mail ( was it written by aog ? )
As you put it - ''Is that so difficult to understand ?? ''
On that note i'll widthdraw from this thread - i'm getting rather bored with it
My comment was relating to headline in the mail ( was it written by aog ? )
As you put it - ''Is that so difficult to understand ?? ''
On that note i'll widthdraw from this thread - i'm getting rather bored with it
> It would be like buying a Lamborghini and keeping it permanently in the garage with the door closed. <
aog when i owned my beast it was kept in a garage locked with at least 3 chains ( bolt cutter proof ) with decent padlocks.
if i parked it outside my house and it was nicked the insurance did not have to pay out, on the insurance it stipulated that the beast had to be kept in a locked garage when i was at home
for me to get the bike out and go for a blast i had to unlock at least 8 locks
aog when i owned my beast it was kept in a garage locked with at least 3 chains ( bolt cutter proof ) with decent padlocks.
if i parked it outside my house and it was nicked the insurance did not have to pay out, on the insurance it stipulated that the beast had to be kept in a locked garage when i was at home
for me to get the bike out and go for a blast i had to unlock at least 8 locks
viv38
No good trying to instil a little common sense in some of this lot viv, it is their usual practice to side-track any story that they find a little too uncomfortable for their tastes, especially if it has been reported on by the Daily Mail and then entered for debate by myself.
They are all so predictable.
No good trying to instil a little common sense in some of this lot viv, it is their usual practice to side-track any story that they find a little too uncomfortable for their tastes, especially if it has been reported on by the Daily Mail and then entered for debate by myself.
They are all so predictable.