Film, Media & TV5 mins ago
Seriously?
176 Answers
What do you make of this report?
http://
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by EcclesCake. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Sorry rory I didn't realise that your post was directed at me- I was responding more to Sqad. The obvious rule is that people whose children are quiet and well mannered are fine and people whose children are loud and disruptive are asked to leave. It works in other countries, so why not the UK?
Do you actually have anything to add to the debate Naomi, or are you just entertaining yourself by being a 'snidey in the sidelines'?
Do you actually have anything to add to the debate Naomi, or are you just entertaining yourself by being a 'snidey in the sidelines'?
If you have an 11 week old child ypu should not be taking it to the cinema even if the rating was PG.
The child will not have the attention to watch the movie. The child should be interacting with the mother.
The mother will not be able to watch the 2 hour movie because of the demands from the child.
The whole expedition is daft. One wonders about how fit this woman is to bring up this child based on this piece of stupidity.
The child will not have the attention to watch the movie. The child should be interacting with the mother.
The mother will not be able to watch the 2 hour movie because of the demands from the child.
The whole expedition is daft. One wonders about how fit this woman is to bring up this child based on this piece of stupidity.
The obvious rule is that people whose children are quiet and well mannered are fine and people whose children are loud and disruptive are asked to leave. It works in other countries, so why not the UK?
That not really an aswer, you would have squabbling mums throwing cups of popcorn over each other.
At what age do you decide that a child can actually understand the film?
My eleven year would certainly understand a 15 certifiate film, but with no definitve rule I could argue he wouldn't understand it so let me in.
That not really an aswer, you would have squabbling mums throwing cups of popcorn over each other.
At what age do you decide that a child can actually understand the film?
My eleven year would certainly understand a 15 certifiate film, but with no definitve rule I could argue he wouldn't understand it so let me in.
I see there are two camps here Naomi- the people who think if their kids don't disturb anyone it's no -one's business and the outraged brigade who believe children should be seen and not heard and now are apparently unfit mothers if they take their children to the cinema as babies (lol- seriously?). As someone who resides firmly in the former camp and having read all arguments for and against, I consider the matter to have been well and truly won for the 'mind your own business ' camp way before I got involved and Sqad's 'smelly' remark was te iccing on the cake- well until gromit posted anyway- that's the icing now:)
Taking a baby into the pictures is a stupid thing to do, but it doesn't make her a bad mother. It just makes her inconsiderate and selfish, and perhaps a bit dim.
They should have stopped her going in, in the first place, just like they would have done if an adult tried to go in there with a 6 year old. Kicking her out after the event wasn't very nice, but they had to do it anyway.
They should have stopped her going in, in the first place, just like they would have done if an adult tried to go in there with a 6 year old. Kicking her out after the event wasn't very nice, but they had to do it anyway.
