Donate SIGN UP

Rolf Harris Trial: The Plot Thickens

Avatar Image
ChillDoubt | 17:36 Fri 23rd May 2014 | News
45 Answers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27541102

Curiouser and curiouser.

This follows the news last week that one witness waived her right to anonimity. Apparently she had to do so because she had already sold her story Down Under.
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 45rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ChillDoubt. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Here you are.

//Mr Harris, who was arrested in March 2013 by police officers working for Operation Yewtree, has been charged with 16 counts of indecent assault on teenage girls and of making indecent images of children//

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2621242/Rolf-Harris-84-arrives-crown-court-supported-wife-face-12-charges-historic-sex-attacks-young-girls.html
..I'm presuming they're drawings... I can't see how he'd 'make' the images otherwise.
could be the, holiday, cine-film the police seized, Naomi. Girl in her bathing suit.
Yes, I suppose it could - but would a picture of a girl in a bathing suit be deemed indecent? What's indecent about that?
well, it was the daughter's friend who he, later, had an affair with. It all sounds a bit nudge-nudge, wink-wink to me.
He was charged with making indecent images of children. If she was one of them, who were the others?
the other kids in the pool?
the prosecution has finished, Naomi. If there were any, what we'd maybe call, indecent images, I think we'd have heard about them.
to be honest I haven't been following the case.
We have heard about them - as per my link - but not since the original charges were brought.
I know in other cases 'victims' have made claims that proved impossible to be true. Why did they get all the way to court when the most cursory of checks would have shown them up for what they were. It weakens the cases of any genuine victims. The police and prosecutors need to shape up, imo.
I know. I'm usually very wary of these historical claims. Young newly wealthy blokes full of their newly found fame, star-struck girls hounding them, different rules in different times - but when children enter the equation alarm bells ring. In the absence of the slightest complaint over the past however many years I'm willing to give most the benefit of the doubt - but this makes me really uncomfortable.
I'm in the clear. I never had any girls hounding me, ;( nite, Naomi, ;)
Night Svejk. :o)
Naomi
Saving an image from the internet onto your computer is construed as 'making an image'
yes N, Z is correct
every time you download a narty narty picture you are deemed to have made one.

case law on which ever act it is, decided very early on....
Thank you Naomi. I also did a search myself and came up with this rather odd site which confirms what you say.
http://theduckshoot.com/did-racist-rolf-harris-possess-child-pornography/
Zeuhl, Thank you. Peter too. I didn't know that. I had ideas of him drawing pictures.

Ladybirder, sickening.
L S Lowry DID do sketches of a little girl in fantasy

and left her the sketches - in his will as he knew how much his paintings were fetching

and when she turned 21 - she cried a bit - and SOLD them !
no question of the kid being abused - they were fastasy...- match stick girl in frilly knickers and so on

we lived in less censorious times then

-- answer removed --
// We live in hope that all people who have been assaulted tell the police at the time. //

It really would make everyone's life easier, wouldnt it ?

21 to 40 of 45rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Rolf Harris Trial: The Plot Thickens

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.