@mikey4444
//Apart from SP, isn't there anybody else on here today, that thinks it was an error of judgement for UKIP to hold Hitler up as a good example of anything at all ? As SP has said, there are plenty of other good speakers that Ethridge could have used as examples, but instead he chose to invoke Hitler !//
By "anyone else on here" did you mean anyone else reading the thread or anyone else on the whole of Answerbank?
If the latter, then it's slightly unfair on those who are repelled by the thread title, alone, never mind the content. (I nearly didn't).
For the record, yes, I agree it was an error of judgement for the UKIP person.
I also think that Hitler was an overly theatrical orator: Apoplectic, manic, far too shouty for my liking. His audience could see he was an angry man, even in the 1930's. I can't imagine any of them _not_ guessing that he'd be sending them and their fathers, sons, brothers to war before long. (From the women, he only asked for more babies. Putin made a similar appeal to young couples, a year or two ago…).