ChatterBank1 min ago
Hilary Mantel's Thatcher Story
What are your thoughts on this?
http:// www.the guardia n.com/b ooks/20 14/sep/ 22/hila ry-mant el-crit ics-tha tcher-a ssassin ation-s hort-st ory
I will open by saying that I personally found many (but by no means *all*) of Thatcher's views/policies odious, but my personal antipathy for her would never stretch to imagining her assassination, let alone putting pen to paper (or fingers to keyboard) to write such a story.
Admission: I have not read the story, only the reports of it.
Do you think this is a valid piece of fiction about a historical figure, or a nasty piece of 'gloatware'?
http://
I will open by saying that I personally found many (but by no means *all*) of Thatcher's views/policies odious, but my personal antipathy for her would never stretch to imagining her assassination, let alone putting pen to paper (or fingers to keyboard) to write such a story.
Admission: I have not read the story, only the reports of it.
Do you think this is a valid piece of fiction about a historical figure, or a nasty piece of 'gloatware'?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.who was the author who gave critics' names to all his murder victims - until one sued ?
Sir Cyril Black I thought was portrayed as a James Bond villain and sued ( no sense of humour apparently ) but in fact he sued over a work of fiction and pornography... He (CB) was the leading man in a work of absolute filth https:/ /openli brary.o rg/work s/OL156 67750W/ Sir_Cyr il_Blac k
not to be confused with Conrad Black fraudster who did time.
Winston Churchill was mendaciously portrayed by Ralk HochHuth in a play about sacrificing Sikorski. Sikorski was not of course sacrificed - his aeroplane fell out of the air
[ Sorry for those who cant follow parallels - all of the above are other example of fiction and historical figures ]
Sir Cyril Black I thought was portrayed as a James Bond villain and sued ( no sense of humour apparently ) but in fact he sued over a work of fiction and pornography... He (CB) was the leading man in a work of absolute filth https:/
not to be confused with Conrad Black fraudster who did time.
Winston Churchill was mendaciously portrayed by Ralk HochHuth in a play about sacrificing Sikorski. Sikorski was not of course sacrificed - his aeroplane fell out of the air
[ Sorry for those who cant follow parallels - all of the above are other example of fiction and historical figures ]
just more fuel for the TGL vitriol addicts. Still a target after death and 24 years since in power, how effective she must have been to still be a target for this hatred. She must have terrified the anti British left, those that could not stand the fact she stopped their plans and exposed their flawed idiology. Just the sort of BS the brainwashed feed on. Enjoy sheep enjoy.
Never thought I'd agree with Mikey but I do here. I am a historian of sorts and love historical fiction, but Wolf Hall was the moost turgid piece of prose I have ever read. I have not read her second book about Cromwell, nor do I intend to. Most of it was fantasy. If you like historical fiction then you cannot beat Jean Plaidy. Now she did her research.
I freely admit to having not read the story, just seen reports of the fuss over it, but I have to agree with many here that it is fiction. It is about an imagined assassination of someone who is now history. I can see why some might conclude it is a continuation of the distaste for what the main character actually inflicted on the country while she was here, but without further evidence I consider it likely to be an indication of how those who believe that is the case, think, rather than a genuine condemnation of the author. Thinking the worst of folk rather than giving them the benefit of any doubt ?
It seems alot of fuss over nothing. Thatcher is either hated as the most evil person in history, or revered as some sort of god.
Mantel obviously falls into the haters camp, but so what, she can write what she likes. It's no cause for any of the Thatcher worshippers to get annoyed about - especially as that's partly what she's trying to do.
Mantel obviously falls into the haters camp, but so what, she can write what she likes. It's no cause for any of the Thatcher worshippers to get annoyed about - especially as that's partly what she's trying to do.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.