Body & Soul8 mins ago
Time For A Change From Finnigate Maybe........?
Answers
I'm not excusing what he did, but he needs a job. Should he stay on the dole forever? If he got work as a road sweeper or in a chip shop, would we be bothered? Why shouldn't he work in a decent restaurant? It doesn't sound as if he is a habitual preyer on young girls, and he made a terrible mistake through lack of maturity.
01:08 Fri 17th Oct 2014
Gness - "Well....hadn't thought of it like that, Sqad and Jordy......seems like I will have to welcome the paedophile who abused me...and his family....into my home as I do my gay relatives and friends....."
I think Sqad is looking for a bucket of petrol / bonfire interface as a wind-up, and the fewer people, especially those with direct experience of the issues he so casually dismisses, who rise to the bait, the better.
I think Sqad is looking for a bucket of petrol / bonfire interface as a wind-up, and the fewer people, especially those with direct experience of the issues he so casually dismisses, who rise to the bait, the better.
Baldric - "\Baldric - "//A rapist, yes, not a paedophile//
Ah, I see, well guess that'll be ok then!"
I don't imagine ummm was trying to say that one is less than the other, or indeed that either is remotely acceptable.\\
Well, Silly me, why didn't I think of that?"
No idea - but your post suggested that you didn't - unless there was an irony intended which I missed?
Ah, I see, well guess that'll be ok then!"
I don't imagine ummm was trying to say that one is less than the other, or indeed that either is remotely acceptable.\\
Well, Silly me, why didn't I think of that?"
No idea - but your post suggested that you didn't - unless there was an irony intended which I missed?
Sqad - "andy...there you go again..........rubbishing any alternative view to yours............and this time, before you have heard the opinion."
i did nor 'rubbish' your view, I merely pointed out that i think you are beling deliberately provocative.
If I am mistaken, and you genuinely hold such abhorrent views, then I will live with that.
i did nor 'rubbish' your view, I merely pointed out that i think you are beling deliberately provocative.
If I am mistaken, and you genuinely hold such abhorrent views, then I will live with that.
gness......before you kick the wall:
Both are sexual dysfunctions that result in sexual attraction to people who you could not possibly have children with, so they are inherently similar
Obviously not all gay people are paedophiles, but as you would expect there is a large overlap. Gay men are approx twice as likely to be paedophiles as strait men.
Both are sexual dysfunctions that result in sexual attraction to people who you could not possibly have children with, so they are inherently similar
Obviously not all gay people are paedophiles, but as you would expect there is a large overlap. Gay men are approx twice as likely to be paedophiles as strait men.
Sqad - "Both are sexual dysfunctions that result in sexual attraction to people who you could not possibly have children with, so they are inherently similar
Obviously not all gay people are paedophiles, but as you would expect there is a large overlap. Gay men are approx twice as likely to be paedophiles as strait men."
That's cleared up any misunderstanding there then!
" ... but as you would expect there is a large overlap. Gay men are approx twice as likely to be paedophiles as strait men."
Do you have any evidence to back that up Sqad - or have you read it somwhere?
I am not fencing, I am genuinely interested in what forms your viewpoint.
Obviously not all gay people are paedophiles, but as you would expect there is a large overlap. Gay men are approx twice as likely to be paedophiles as strait men."
That's cleared up any misunderstanding there then!
" ... but as you would expect there is a large overlap. Gay men are approx twice as likely to be paedophiles as strait men."
Do you have any evidence to back that up Sqad - or have you read it somwhere?
I am not fencing, I am genuinely interested in what forms your viewpoint.
We've been over that debate before; there is a difference between homosexuality and paedophilia such that the "overlap" is somewhat of a trick, really. Boys are more often victims than girls, perhaps, but that doesn't mean at all that the (predominantly male) abusers are gay. Liking men, and liking boys, are two wholly different things.
jim360 - "there is a difference between homosexuality and paedophilia such that the "overlap" is somewhat of a trick, really."
Exactly.
Paedophillia is about control, power and abuse.
Last time I spoke to any of my gay friends, they didn't seem to going anywhere near that aspect of their sexuality - probably because it doesn't exist.
Sqad - Can you honestly believe that a paedophile / victim relationship in any way resembles the relationship between an adult same-sex couple?
Exactly.
Paedophillia is about control, power and abuse.
Last time I spoke to any of my gay friends, they didn't seem to going anywhere near that aspect of their sexuality - probably because it doesn't exist.
Sqad - Can you honestly believe that a paedophile / victim relationship in any way resembles the relationship between an adult same-sex couple?
Yes...I noticed that, but was not sure what they meant by "Androphillic males"
\\\This suggests that the resulting proportion of true pedophiles among persons with a homosexual erotic development is greater than that in persons who develop heterosexually.\\\
This penultimate sentence seemed to make more sense.
\\\This suggests that the resulting proportion of true pedophiles among persons with a homosexual erotic development is greater than that in persons who develop heterosexually.\\\
This penultimate sentence seemed to make more sense.
///Baldric - "\Baldric - "//A rapist, yes, not a paedophile//
Ah, I see, well guess that'll be ok then!"
I don't imagine ummm was trying to say that one is less than the other, or indeed that either is remotely acceptable.\\
Well, Silly me, why didn't I think of that?"
No idea - but your post suggested that you didn't - unless there was an irony intended which I missed?///
Irony, Moi?
You miss something, it could happen I guess, even to the Holier than thou!
Ah, I see, well guess that'll be ok then!"
I don't imagine ummm was trying to say that one is less than the other, or indeed that either is remotely acceptable.\\
Well, Silly me, why didn't I think of that?"
No idea - but your post suggested that you didn't - unless there was an irony intended which I missed?///
Irony, Moi?
You miss something, it could happen I guess, even to the Holier than thou!
Sqad - "Yes...I noticed that, but was not sure what they meant by "Androphillic males"
Androphilia and gynephilia are terms used in behavioral science to describe sexual orientation, as an alternative to a gender binary homosexual and heterosexual conceptualization. Androphilia describes sexual attraction to men or masculinity; gynephilia describes the sexual attraction to women or femininity.
If you don't know what your 'evidence' means, might be an idea to either - find out what it means or, don't quote it lest you be tripped up and hoist by your own petard.
Androphilia and gynephilia are terms used in behavioral science to describe sexual orientation, as an alternative to a gender binary homosexual and heterosexual conceptualization. Androphilia describes sexual attraction to men or masculinity; gynephilia describes the sexual attraction to women or femininity.
If you don't know what your 'evidence' means, might be an idea to either - find out what it means or, don't quote it lest you be tripped up and hoist by your own petard.
Latest Posts
Climate Change Robs Family Of Life...
ChatterBank10 mins ago
Music14 mins ago
Crosswords20 mins ago
Family & Relationships21 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles41 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.