News1 min ago
Peter Sutcliffe
The Yorkshire Ripper has had a heart attack . . . .
. . . . oh dear!
. . . . oh dear!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sir.prize. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The immediate reaction for a number of people on receiving this news is to hope Sutcliffe either dies in agony, or perhaps lives on in agony.
I find this stance disappointing.
He is criminally insane, and is where he belongs, in a secure psychiatric institution - so gloating over any suffering is really not appropriate.
What is interesting is that he has become a Jehovah's Witness.
I am trying to resist a comment on that!
I find this stance disappointing.
He is criminally insane, and is where he belongs, in a secure psychiatric institution - so gloating over any suffering is really not appropriate.
What is interesting is that he has become a Jehovah's Witness.
I am trying to resist a comment on that!
TWE - "He was that insane Andy, the police could not catch him, a very devious man."
Deviousness and insanity are not necessarily connected, you don;t have to have one to be the other.
Not sure if you are old enough to have been around when the Ripper murders took place - I was, and I remember it well.
For a start, police proceedures were nothing like as comprehensive as they are now. There was no internet, no DNA, no computerised records, and little sharing of information between different police forces.
Plus, the entire operation was completely derailed by a hoax caller, a Geordie who taunted the police and sent them off in completely the wrong direction, leaving Sutcliffe to kill three more times.
Sutcliffe was actually interviewed and released twice during the enquiries, and he was only caught in the end because of a dodgy numberplate, so it was actually complete luck that he was aprehended when he was.
Allowing for that context, devious as Sutcliffe may have been, he didn't have to work too hard to avoid capture.
Deviousness and insanity are not necessarily connected, you don;t have to have one to be the other.
Not sure if you are old enough to have been around when the Ripper murders took place - I was, and I remember it well.
For a start, police proceedures were nothing like as comprehensive as they are now. There was no internet, no DNA, no computerised records, and little sharing of information between different police forces.
Plus, the entire operation was completely derailed by a hoax caller, a Geordie who taunted the police and sent them off in completely the wrong direction, leaving Sutcliffe to kill three more times.
Sutcliffe was actually interviewed and released twice during the enquiries, and he was only caught in the end because of a dodgy numberplate, so it was actually complete luck that he was aprehended when he was.
Allowing for that context, devious as Sutcliffe may have been, he didn't have to work too hard to avoid capture.
hc4361 - "andy, there is a world of difference in me hoping he suffers for many years and me voting for a system that made sure he suffered for may years."
Is there?
Do you not have the courage of your convictions?
I do not think he should suffer inhumanely, nor would i vote for a system that made it happen.
How could you believe in suffering, and not implement it if you could?
Is there?
Do you not have the courage of your convictions?
I do not think he should suffer inhumanely, nor would i vote for a system that made it happen.
How could you believe in suffering, and not implement it if you could?