Editor's Blog4 mins ago
Faith Education - Is It The Way To Go?
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/ed ucation -304224 67
seems like loads of these top acheiving schoolsa re fatih based (?compared to how many faith based schools there are?)
is this the way we should be going for education?
seems like loads of these top acheiving schoolsa re fatih based (?compared to how many faith based schools there are?)
is this the way we should be going for education?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bednobs. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.jim, these figures bear you out
http:// www.the guardia n.com/n ews/dat ablog/2 012/mar /05/fai th-scho ols-adm issions
http://
"I would go a step further and hope that one day faith based schools of whatever nomination are banned"
I would go a step farther than that. I would seek a society where the exhibition and practice of faiths of all descriptions are banned (except possibly in the privacy of one's own home). People who want to do the "collective worship" thing can have a few friends round and spout their jibberish in their own front room (with the curtains drawn). Religion is a scourge on the modern world. It was OK five hundred years ago but things have moved on.
I would go a step farther than that. I would seek a society where the exhibition and practice of faiths of all descriptions are banned (except possibly in the privacy of one's own home). People who want to do the "collective worship" thing can have a few friends round and spout their jibberish in their own front room (with the curtains drawn). Religion is a scourge on the modern world. It was OK five hundred years ago but things have moved on.
O.K., if we are moving of the main subject, I'll follow.
Without having to face it, I have often wondered if swearing on the bible or affirming would be wisest.
I suspect that affirming, although honest, there would be a bias towards disbelief in one's testimony. To avoid perjury, everyone should simply affirm. That would remove problems of "which bible" and any convinced religious judge or jury-member.
More than time-up on modernising the legal process.
SIQ.
Without having to face it, I have often wondered if swearing on the bible or affirming would be wisest.
I suspect that affirming, although honest, there would be a bias towards disbelief in one's testimony. To avoid perjury, everyone should simply affirm. That would remove problems of "which bible" and any convinced religious judge or jury-member.
More than time-up on modernising the legal process.
SIQ.
for chrissake everyone !
is it the way to go ? er hello - faith based education has been guaranteed by law since the 1944 Butler Education act
that is a big difference between us and the Land of the Free
( no faith stuff in skoolz by federal law )
unfortunately bedknobz misprint "fatih" has a meaning in Arabic - conqueror and I thought Oh God what are the islamic skoolz doing now ?
is it the way to go ? er hello - faith based education has been guaranteed by law since the 1944 Butler Education act
that is a big difference between us and the Land of the Free
( no faith stuff in skoolz by federal law )
unfortunately bedknobz misprint "fatih" has a meaning in Arabic - conqueror and I thought Oh God what are the islamic skoolz doing now ?
My youngest four go to a C of E primary school (just because it is the village school not because we are religious) but it's not very churchy - they do go to the church for various things and the vicar can be seen at various school things but she's not v churchy either. Catholic schools (especially secondary) were always viewed as v strict when I was teaching, might account for why they get better results.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.