I Wonder Why This Number Is Rising So...
Politics2 mins ago
Grandma's Hug - Shocking Story
http://
Of course we don't know the whole story but it all seems rather harsh to me - I think Derbyshire Social Services have a lot to answer for in all this. She obviously loves her granddaughter.
Of course we don't know the whole story but it all seems rather harsh to me - I think Derbyshire Social Services have a lot to answer for in all this. She obviously loves her granddaughter.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Ann. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
More info in the Guardian:
The local authority had alleged Danby was in breach of court orders made in September 2013 and in January and April 2014.
The orders banned Danby from any communication, save a single supervised monthly phone call, or visiting the granddaughter’s home town or college, or going within 100 metres of the girl.
Dowding said it was “very sad” that Danby had failed to comply with the court orders, which evidence showed had resulted in “a detrimental effect” on the granddaughter’s behaviour, “with consequences serious and profound”.
http://
The local authority had alleged Danby was in breach of court orders made in September 2013 and in January and April 2014.
The orders banned Danby from any communication, save a single supervised monthly phone call, or visiting the granddaughter’s home town or college, or going within 100 metres of the girl.
Dowding said it was “very sad” that Danby had failed to comply with the court orders, which evidence showed had resulted in “a detrimental effect” on the granddaughter’s behaviour, “with consequences serious and profound”.
http://
//It's the Daily Mail - can't believe a word of it. //
it's in the guardian too Canary
http://
now let's hear you denounce the guardian as a lying rag......
it's in the guardian too Canary
http://
now let's hear you denounce the guardian as a lying rag......
The grandmother (nice emotive word that - less impressive if we call her just 'a woman') had a court order made against her, preventing anything other than supervised telephone access.
This order would only have been granted if the court was convinced that any other contact was highly detrimental to the child's emotional and/or physical well-being.
The order was made, the woman deliberately flouted it, risking the child's health by doing so, and is now playing the 'weeping grannie' card.
She should be locked up.
This order would only have been granted if the court was convinced that any other contact was highly detrimental to the child's emotional and/or physical well-being.
The order was made, the woman deliberately flouted it, risking the child's health by doing so, and is now playing the 'weeping grannie' card.
She should be locked up.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.