I am rather surprised this has not been discussed.
Bristol is implementing two smoke free zones. I feel this is just going a bit too far. What next fat people free zones, or poor people free zones etc.
Until the Governement bans the sale of tobacco altogether no-one should dictate what smokers should do. There are be designated areas for smokers who are working or attending matters in a building. Otherwise there is nothing wrong with smoking outdoors as long as it's not offending other people, young children etc. Smokers pay enough for their pleasure they have rights too.
I understand from today's papers, that these zones are voluntary. It will be interesting to see what the response is amongst smokers. Personally I think its worth a trial to see if it works.
I used to like sitting outside a country Pub in the summer, having lunch and enjoying the fresh air. But now so many Beer Gardens just reek of fag ends and cigarette smoke.
I can't be doing with all this self righteous faffing....I think they should just take us out somewhere and shoot us....quietly of course...and with non smoking guns......x
Yes secondhand smoke can be damaging(risky) but when outside I can only imagine this as minimal. This argument does make me smile when you read about what is quite legitamately put in our food.
Any attempt to restrict poisonous drugs (e.g. heroin, cocaine, nicotine, alcohol) is to be commended. Unfortunately enforcement is impossible (e.g. Prohibition).