Donate SIGN UP

Is This Right To Give A Prison Sentence To Run Concurrently With One Already .....

Avatar Image
ladybirder | 22:16 Mon 02nd Feb 2015 | News
23 Answers
being served for a previous crime? From the link:

>> Samad Uddin is already currently serving a 32-month sentence for possession with intent to supply and money laundering, which he was jailed for in January. The judge told him the GBH sentence would run concurrently.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 23rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ladybirder. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
What is the point of a sentence that is served concurrently? Saving money ?
-- answer removed --
No, they should not have concurrent sentencing full stop. Ridiculous notion.
Quite rare, but I agree with TTT, concurrent is pointless.
someone pass the smelling salts!
Question Author
Not a notion though is it, it's a fact.

And they're not even linked db! You're right, it is a legal BOGOF. My ghast is flabbered! This cannot be right and it makes me wonder how often it happens.

Daisy, I wonder too, so wrong if it is.

Question Author
Do you know that it is quite rare Canary because I hope you're right.
Quite rare when it is often reported in the papers?
I have always been baffled by concurrent sentencing. It's almost like letting the offender off in my opinion. I know they still have the conviction, but they have not really been punished for their crimes.
Question Author
Not for totally separate crimes though Daisy??
Question Author
He was one of the ringleaders as well.
In cases like this I really wish they would just throw away the key.
Question Author
Yes, it probably passed as a good evening's entertainment for them Naomi.

I honestly didn't realise that the judge could do what he has done here, i.e. run the current sentence concurrently with a previous one for a different crime. Wish NJ was about.
US student was kicked and punched 40 times in 30 seconds by London thugs three days after he arrived in Britain because he 'wasn't local

I see the perpetrators of this nasty crime have all got traditional East end names !.
Question Author
You might say that Tony, I couldn't possibly comment:-)
;-)
Ridiculous, it should be added on to the end of the sentence not included in the time already served.

It's like if you buy a house, you don't get a car for free because you already spent money for something else.
Question Author
Thanks for your reply Frizzy and welcome to AB.
I see tacking time to be served onto a previous conviction for a completely different crime as a travesty of justice. Shouldn't be allowed in my opinion.
you could try asking the same question in law and see if anyone knows. It strikes me as unusual but there may be a reason.

1 to 20 of 23rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Is This Right To Give A Prison Sentence To Run Concurrently With One Already .....

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.