ChatterBank32 mins ago
We'll Know Where Fred Is For The Next Few Years....
50 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by jackthehat. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.AOG...your earlier comment at 13:59 is entirely irrelevant and completely unnecessary.
You will know by all the previous posts on this subject, that I abhor all incidences in child sexual abuse, whoever it is committed by.
I resent you and others suggesting that I discriminate between abusers according to their race and colour....I most certainly do not, and it is disingenuous and insulting of you to imply that I do.
Thanks to Ummmm, jackthehat, and others.
You will know by all the previous posts on this subject, that I abhor all incidences in child sexual abuse, whoever it is committed by.
I resent you and others suggesting that I discriminate between abusers according to their race and colour....I most certainly do not, and it is disingenuous and insulting of you to imply that I do.
Thanks to Ummmm, jackthehat, and others.
Youngmafbog - Although I'm of the thinking of 'lock them up and let them spend however many years looking over their shoulders' I fully understand why people feel so strongly. I might not agree with knee jerk reactions....but I do understand.
It's in most peoples natural instinct to protect children so crimes against them gets the worse reaction.
It's in most peoples natural instinct to protect children so crimes against them gets the worse reaction.
I must be missing something... is it possible to look at a child and know if they have gone through puberty, are going through puberty, haven't yet started puberty?
To me they are paedophiles. Using the the dictionary's most simplistic meaning..
'A person who is sexually attracted to children.'
In theory using the prepubescent argument you could call one man a paedophile and yet another man not a paedophile despite them both having sex with a child of the same age.
To me they are paedophiles. Using the the dictionary's most simplistic meaning..
'A person who is sexually attracted to children.'
In theory using the prepubescent argument you could call one man a paedophile and yet another man not a paedophile despite them both having sex with a child of the same age.