Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 20 of 54rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I don't know why this is news, this sort of thing has been going on in Stamford Hill for generations, using the Beth Din courts for all aspects of life.

That seems to be the gist of it.
There are eruvs in Manchester and London with more planned which have never been considered a subject of debate on AnswerBank.

//There are eruvs in Manchester and London with more planned which have never been considered a subject of debate on AnswerBank. //

probably because eruv dwellers aren't renowned for flying planes into tall buildings or blowing up underground trains.
What has that got to do with it, mushroom?
Regardless, no group should be allowed to ban women in Britain from driving.
The ban only works if those banned choose to submit to it.
Talbot, the women concerned may choose to follow the ruling, or disregard it.

No different from Catholics being 'banned' from using contraception by their church.
driving in stamford hill must be a nightmare, you'd think they'd be pleased

The word used is 'Banned' is that really a choice?
Question Author
hc4361

/// No different from Catholics being 'banned' from using contraception by their church. ///

Hasn't your dad had a word with you, there is a great deal of difference from not being allowed to drive a car and not being allowed to practice birth control. :0)
It is not enforceable under British law therefore the 'banee' can decide whether to abide by it or not.
I accept that it may be a decision involving an amount of social upheaval but she could always opt out.
Is that word used, Talbot? I haven't seen a copy of the letter and the word is in inverted commas in the news report.
AOG - ///// No different from Catholics being 'banned' from using contraception by their church. ///

Hasn't your dad had a word with you, there is a great deal of difference from not being allowed to drive a car and not being allowed to practice birth control. :0) //

In this context - there is no difference -

the rules are made by people who don't have to live by them, for the benefit of their own power trip, regardless of the inconvenience at least, and life-changing misery at worst, that are the effects of their unreasonable and impractical brainstorms.
I'm taking it that this kind of behavior towards women is seen as acceptable then?

I know nothing about the Jewish way of life but this sounds just like Muslim women a free not to wear the Burka even if the loving husband insists she does wear it.


hc4361: An eruv has absolutely no affect on non-jews. It is a notional boundary that allows them to carry books, push a stroller and similar activities on certain days.

This is unlike a lot of the crazy laws the people mushroom25 was referring to have.

The laws of any religion have no impact on me or my way of life, Raleigh
I look forward to a court case where a family sues the school for discriminating against their children. This hasn't a chance of standing up in English law.
You should study the lifestyle of the Hassidim. An eye-opener, indeed. They follow the most extraordinary practices. For instance, this is the whole of their sex-education;
The bridegroom is told " You must satisfy your wife"
The bride is told "It gets better".
Hassidim actually forbid any sex-education whatsoever.
It would seem that its not just the Muslims that make unfair demands on women !

Good, old-fashioned misogyny, nothing more or less !
Perhaps the ban is intended as a road safety measure--retires quickly.

1 to 20 of 54rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Hasidic Jewish And Female Living In Stamford Hill, Then You Don't Get To Drive?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.