Travel0 min ago
What Is This American Woman On !
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/wo rld-us- canada- 3315259 6
You are either black or you are not. Her parents have said that she is most definitely white, so why is she still continuing to say she is black ?
Quote from her Mother, in the above link :::
"Hours beforehand, her mother Rutheanne Dolezal told the BBC's Victoria Derbyshire programme that her daughter had become "disconnected from reality".
You can say that again !
You are either black or you are not. Her parents have said that she is most definitely white, so why is she still continuing to say she is black ?
Quote from her Mother, in the above link :::
"Hours beforehand, her mother Rutheanne Dolezal told the BBC's Victoria Derbyshire programme that her daughter had become "disconnected from reality".
You can say that again !
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.So, this is a bit like a little girl drawing herself as a little boy and feeling more masculine than feminine. If she did that would her parents think she was 'disconnected from reality'. I think her parents behavior is disgusting. They can't be racist as they adopted a black boy -maybe they treated him in a different way,or she was jealous as a child? who knows? There is no reason for them to support the Lynch mob Press in this matter. I doubt she got the job because she said she was mixed race. I would not have resigned from my job,does this give the message that you can't work for NAACP if you are white?
This isn't a recent thing, she has 'been black' for many years. She is on record giving interviews about her 'struggles' growing up as a black person, the racism she has faced because of her colour.....the problems she has had with her 'frizzy' hair, etc. etc..
All of which her 'naturally' black colleagues will have truly experienced.....I would feel humiliated at the thought that someone had assumed my very real life-challenges purely for effect.
She could have done good works for the NAACP as a white person.
All of which her 'naturally' black colleagues will have truly experienced.....I would feel humiliated at the thought that someone had assumed my very real life-challenges purely for effect.
She could have done good works for the NAACP as a white person.
// there got be money involved somewhere in the equation.//
yup internal litigation within the family apparently
[ just like the 1690 Salem witch trials were really about property/land disputes ]
Altho I have to say - if my d said I was black and I was in fact a son of a Norwegian immigrant, I probably would say : I dont look at it like that
The bruv ( adopted and really black this time ) dobbed her in
yup internal litigation within the family apparently
[ just like the 1690 Salem witch trials were really about property/land disputes ]
Altho I have to say - if my d said I was black and I was in fact a son of a Norwegian immigrant, I probably would say : I dont look at it like that
The bruv ( adopted and really black this time ) dobbed her in
// where does it stop -oh you can't work for Gay rights because you are not Gay? Incredible.//
since we are firmly in the twilight zone retro
They ( tv) were looking at the Wildeblood case, I think that was the 1956 prosecutions for homosexuality and CHE was set up. - - and - and The Pres said to the secretary of the organisation ( someone recalled ) why are you doing this,
and the secretary said because I am gay
and the pres said - oh heavens that has really wrecked it - we cant say you support this from a human rights point of view ( blah blah blah )
so that is a counter example from history - to work in gay rights org, you CAN'T be gay ( then in the fifties )
the past is a different country - possibly a twlight zone
I think the Dad could not say no comment to paternity without introducing the idea that - erm he wasnt... ( the Dad )
since we are firmly in the twilight zone retro
They ( tv) were looking at the Wildeblood case, I think that was the 1956 prosecutions for homosexuality and CHE was set up. - - and - and The Pres said to the secretary of the organisation ( someone recalled ) why are you doing this,
and the secretary said because I am gay
and the pres said - oh heavens that has really wrecked it - we cant say you support this from a human rights point of view ( blah blah blah )
so that is a counter example from history - to work in gay rights org, you CAN'T be gay ( then in the fifties )
the past is a different country - possibly a twlight zone
I think the Dad could not say no comment to paternity without introducing the idea that - erm he wasnt... ( the Dad )