Free TV licences were introduced by Gordon Brown, largely as a bribe to get the grey vote. The new Government has decided it does not want to pay for this anymore, so the cost, £650million will now be met by the BBC. In effect money which would go to making programmes is now to be diverted to subsidising pensioners.
Rather a neat trick by The Government, not cutting the subsidy which would be unpopular, but deciding not to fund the subsidy themselves.
Is it time to do away with Gordon's old bribe? Is it not a con that money we all pay to fund the BBC is now being diverted to fund lucences for old people. Or perhaps National Lottery money could be used instead of cutting programming money.
For me the licence is really good value.....there are some TV programmes I enjoy but I couldn't do without the radio.....I'd pay for that alone. I may be fortunate in not needing a free licence...... and not knowing anyone who does but I would like the BBC to put the money into quality programme making rather than giving it to many of us who really don't need...
I'm not sure that funding of free licences for any specific age group is warranted - and even if it was , we have the age old problem of , why should people within that group , who can afford the licence get a freebie .
It's like child benefit or the winter fuel payment
Personally I would be able to pay the fee without difficulty but appreciate that there are others who are not so fortunate. People tend to get less spare cash once they retire so I can't see how the magic 75years was arrived at, why not 65?. What is peeving is the amount of money the BBC waste, which had been given quite a lot of publicity lately.
Think it's called Child Tax Credit now and not everyone gets it - think it depends on the parents' income. My daughter certainly doesn't get anything for her two boys.
"Rather a neat trick by The Government, not cutting the subsidy which would be unpopular, but deciding not to fund the subsidy themselves."
Not at all unlike their plan to reduce drastically the number of children living in poverty by the simple expedient of creating a new definition of what 'poverty' actually means!
As far as I know child benefit still exists, it appears on Gov.uk website. I thought everybody got it until the child was 16,unless one parent earns over a certain amount. £50.000
What about the £10 Christmas Bonus we get, not to mention the £0.25p extra we get on on our pensions when one reaches 80years old, should they also be scrapped?
Maybe they should introduce a BBC sports channel and increase their licence fee for all those who wish to watch it.
And why do TV companies always have to have two news presenters on their news broadcasts, generally one male and one female, or one black or Asian and one white?
No it should not be scrapped but extended to those under and equal to 75 also.
Surely it is not a payout so needs no funding, it is simply less dosh coming in. Consequently it should not be removed from a budget agreed to be needed to cover the cost of the production. The collection of money to pay for the BBC is quite a separate issue from the budget allocated to run it.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.