How people can get upset at this is beyond me. It is neither a lovely thought nor touching, merely a example of what can be done with photographs on the internet. There must be thousands of examples where this has been done to comic effect. Replace Diana with Queen Victoria and people would be howling with laughter.
'for the simple and unfortunate fact that the photo includes an image of a person who to many invokes, deserving or not, a great deal of emotional import.'
.......Not in my case. It's just wrong to photoshop a dead person into a photograph of your pregnant daughter in law.
Not sucking up but I agree with you. There are several remarks and attempts at humour about Diana on this thread that I found vulgar and unpleasant. The removed post wasn't even vaguely offensive.
Different senses of humour I suppose.
Mikey - I don't know why this Diana cult came about -her public 'persona' was about as far removed from her real private persona as there could be
, but, like Marilyn Munro and the many other tragic figures that left us at far too young an age, she will remain a figure of public adoration.
Ummmm In deed that would be your choice and if that made you happy fair enough. But if someone took a picture of your late father, photo shopped him without the families permission into a contemporary shot and posted it for all to see -would you still be happy?
They may not be offended but saddened. Whatever they think the photo to me is horrible and insensitive and that was the original question. You feel differently as do some others, neither opinion is right or wrong.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.