ChatterBank3 mins ago
Immigrants
122 Answers
Answers
Then they should make their way to the nearest safe country mikey- I'm crap at geography but I'm pretty sure the UK isn't the nearest one.
10:30 Fri 04th Sep 2015
(why would immigrants want to be plonked in the desert)
"Why not?. The Arabs can get Vacation resorts built in the sea. They can provide refugee accommodation in the desert.
The British and Americans built Camp Bastion and Helmund in desert areas. Apart from incoming rounds they looked well appointed and cosy. "
Yes but they aren't there now are they lol How long would you want to spend in a refugee camp, in the desert or anywhere else, for that matter?
"Why not?. The Arabs can get Vacation resorts built in the sea. They can provide refugee accommodation in the desert.
The British and Americans built Camp Bastion and Helmund in desert areas. Apart from incoming rounds they looked well appointed and cosy. "
Yes but they aren't there now are they lol How long would you want to spend in a refugee camp, in the desert or anywhere else, for that matter?
-- answer removed --
I've read your poem, Maggie. This elegy for the dead infant seems to assert the following:
If "we" had prevented the conflict in Syria the baby would not be dead.
That apart, if the West had more compassion the baby would not be dead.
These deaths will continue to occur until Europe offers a home to everyone who wants to come and live in it.
Well, I agree with you completely on the third proposition, although, unlike you I imagine, I would find this "solution" abhorrent (no compassion, you see!). But, as for the first two, I can't see how we could have stopped what is happening in Syria, nor can I understand the "for want of a helping hand" point. What hand? And where? No northern European, as far as I know, was party to the transaction which commissioned a "boat without a sail" to travel fro Turkey to Cos. Weren't the agents involved traffickers on the one hand and Syrian parents on the other?
If "we" had prevented the conflict in Syria the baby would not be dead.
That apart, if the West had more compassion the baby would not be dead.
These deaths will continue to occur until Europe offers a home to everyone who wants to come and live in it.
Well, I agree with you completely on the third proposition, although, unlike you I imagine, I would find this "solution" abhorrent (no compassion, you see!). But, as for the first two, I can't see how we could have stopped what is happening in Syria, nor can I understand the "for want of a helping hand" point. What hand? And where? No northern European, as far as I know, was party to the transaction which commissioned a "boat without a sail" to travel fro Turkey to Cos. Weren't the agents involved traffickers on the one hand and Syrian parents on the other?
-- answer removed --
I am disappointed that dc has given in to pressure, but at least he is proposing to take in direct from the UN camps and not from those already fleeing across Europe. I have a very sympathy with genuine refugees, but there are a fair few economic migrants amongst those who are genuine. I feel like Boo does, reading her various comments. As an aside, and as a parent, if I were in a safe country like Turkey I would not risk my child's life by putting them a crowd dingy to reach Greece. I would only do this if I was actually in fear of their lives.
I agree NellieMay. I too am disappointed with Cameron's decision. However, taking people from the camps is the right thing to do and perhaps by doing so will discourage those who think they can call the shots as is happening in Hungary at present.
You are spot on about not risking your child's life once in a safe country.
You are spot on about not risking your child's life once in a safe country.
"I wonder if this has increase support for UKIP? "
This may not have helped their cause
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-32 21258/O utrage- Ukip-ca ndidate -says-t ragic-S yrian-t oddler- Aylan-d ied-par ents-gr eedy-go od-life .html
Nigel will need to get the big stick out again I fear :-)
This may not have helped their cause
http://
Nigel will need to get the big stick out again I fear :-)
How long would you want to spend in a refugee camp"
I wouldn't, but then again im not fleeing a war torn country. Surely anywhere that's willing to take you has to be a better alternative?
Yes indeed, but after a while, you know, maybe you might want to move on.
The point is, many of these people have been refugees for years. And like I said before, I daresay you might get fed up after a while, so it's hard therefore to criticise others for behaving ... naturally
Still, at least they aren't taking all your bags -)
I wouldn't, but then again im not fleeing a war torn country. Surely anywhere that's willing to take you has to be a better alternative?
Yes indeed, but after a while, you know, maybe you might want to move on.
The point is, many of these people have been refugees for years. And like I said before, I daresay you might get fed up after a while, so it's hard therefore to criticise others for behaving ... naturally
Still, at least they aren't taking all your bags -)
The only reason they are in Hungary is because they are in transit : they don't want to stay there, plainly the Hungarian government does not want them either. On the other hand the German government DOES want them. Being out on a train and lied to Thst tiu are being sent to safety and then bring dragged off to a filthy 'holding camp' is hardly 'calling the shots'
They are rather the victims of a prime minister trying to appear tough to hold off his own neo nazi Jobbik opposition party.
They are rather the victims of a prime minister trying to appear tough to hold off his own neo nazi Jobbik opposition party.