Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 107rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Scotland was Tory country in the 50s. Half of the MPs were Tory.
Steg, "So did the conservitives"

Case closed.
Much of England was Roman at one time.
Wasn't them that built Hadrian's wall.
Avatar Image
youngmafbog
Steg, "So did the conservitives"

Case closed.

Lol
In the USA the right to take the hallucinogenic drug, mescaline, is granted to some Native Americans as part of religious ceremonies.
Is this a lame attempt to "play the race card" ?

It's an odd inference that middle class people are allowed to smoke cannabis. They are only able to do it if they do it in secret, and don't get caught.

Is she suggesting that her Rastafarian boyfriend NEVER smokes cannabis in secret?

If he does have a secret smoke, then he is in EXACTLY the same position as the so-called middle class people.

Her suggestion that they are somehow treated differently? Blatantly playing the "race card". Also, playing the "class card".

Was it TTT who described this lady as a bit thick? If so ... nail, head, etc ... because she evidently is bit thick.
Actually, maybe it's unfair to call her a bit thick.

Perhaps she is a highly intelligent lady who thinks that she can sneak ridiculous non sequiturs past the public because she thinks it is we who are a bit thick.

In which case, she's just patronising.

(patronising is when you talk to people as though they are less intelligent than you)
@ JJ :-)
Avatar Image
joggerjayne
Is this a lame attempt to "play the race card" ?
No it's religious

"Is she suggesting that her Rastafarian boyfriend NEVER smokes cannabis in secret? "
No, she is telling you that he has never used cannabis

Her suggestion that they are somehow treated differently? Blatantly playing the "race card". Also, playing the "class card".
Don't think she said they were being treated differently, you seem to be the one trying to play the race card

"Was it TTT who described this lady as a bit thick? If so ... nail, head, etc ... because she evidently is bit thick"
I'm starting to think she may not be the only one


Ouch!

But ...

// Don't think they said they were treated differently ... //

"Those that are ... middle to upper class can partake in illicit substances in their university days without ever jeopardising their future career ...

but for many people from a working class background, a drugs related conviction, no matter how minor, can have a devastating impact on their life chances in terms of employment."

So she might slightly be suggesting they are treated differently.

Middle class ... "no effect" on career

Working class ... "devastating effect" on future employment

That might be interpreted as being treated differently?

(doesn't mean Steg is wrong about me being a bit thick, though)
TTT...well, the Tories only had one ruddy MP to start with in Scotland, so its not as if they had much to lose !
-- answer removed --
Ah, I thought you were meaning she said Rastas were treated different as this is what the threads about
//@ToraToraTora
you have to be a couple of cans short of six pack if you think the right to take drugs is a oooman rite!
//

Is drinking alcohol a human right?

If yes, then why are other ways of getting inebriated forbidden?

On the flipside, if legalising cannabis brings in extra revenue, won't it all get eaten up treating the paranoia cases or the fallout from the things they do?



Bouncer33
He is her boyfriend! think I can understand why he is on the Drugs.

That's good... Because he's not
Bouncer The point is that he has NEVER used drugs. Try to keep up.
Looking at her, i suppose hes about as good as she can expect to get..


(((He is her boyfriend! think I can understand why he is on the Drugs.)))

Let another Link Bouncer has failed to read or more likely to understand

///'He's probably the only Rastafarian - oh I might get shot down in flames for this – who has never used cannabis.'///
@jogger_jayne

//(patronising is when you talk to people as though they are less intelligent than you)//

As though they are *less knowledgeable* than you, surely? If you thought someone was genuinely less intelligent, you wouldn't even bother explaining.

Stupidity and ignorance are not the same thing.

21 to 40 of 107rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Is This Scottish Mp's Boyfriend Having His Civil Liberties Infringed?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.