ChatterBank1 min ago
Please Please I Want To Play Too.....
49 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -politi cs-3492 7939
Ok let all and sundry Bomb Daesh and really I couldn't care less if we join in but would we make any difference? I mean uncle tom cobbly and all are bombing anyway so could we do something else useful to help? Too many Cooks? I just get the impression that Dave is feeling left out and wants to be in the "in crowd"!
Ok let all and sundry Bomb Daesh and really I couldn't care less if we join in but would we make any difference? I mean uncle tom cobbly and all are bombing anyway so could we do something else useful to help? Too many Cooks? I just get the impression that Dave is feeling left out and wants to be in the "in crowd"!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It boils down to two things doesn't it? Would it make a difference, and/or should we be "doing our bit"
I'm not sure it would make a difference: it depends what the actual plan is. Extra bombing raids would not necessarily be advisable, or help, for various reasons, one of which of course being the "crowded skies" above Syria.
On the other hand, should we not be doing some of the work, and giving the others a "rest"
Of course, Dave can't really sell it as such: he has to push the "in Britain's interests" line harder than perhaps it ought to be pushed.
We definitely should not be looking to start fighting against Assad's forces. Syria needs, desperately, a ceasefire, and that would only make matters worse for the ordinary people.
I'm not sure it would make a difference: it depends what the actual plan is. Extra bombing raids would not necessarily be advisable, or help, for various reasons, one of which of course being the "crowded skies" above Syria.
On the other hand, should we not be doing some of the work, and giving the others a "rest"
Of course, Dave can't really sell it as such: he has to push the "in Britain's interests" line harder than perhaps it ought to be pushed.
We definitely should not be looking to start fighting against Assad's forces. Syria needs, desperately, a ceasefire, and that would only make matters worse for the ordinary people.
I can agree to an extent.Costs a lot of money to lob a load of ordnance about indescriminateley. That is why they would probably have F.A.C on the ground.
It is not widely published that many U.S. airstrikes are aborted and return with bomb loads because targets are obscured or to risky with regard to collateral damage.
It is not widely published that many U.S. airstrikes are aborted and return with bomb loads because targets are obscured or to risky with regard to collateral damage.
Even if they managed to wipe out every single
IS/ISIL/ISIS/DAESH/Caliphate/Califig (or whatever today’s fashionable name is) member, supporter and hanger-on in Syria, these people are still living, plotting and acting within the civilised world, and free to move around, as proven by the recent atrocities in Paris.
And Mr. Cameron claims he wants to work toward a political solution in the region. I fail to see how this can happen when they live their lives by their religion and there are so many different religious factions squabbling with each other and vying for a place at the trough.
It hasn’t worked too well in Egypt so far.
IS/ISIL/ISIS/DAESH/Caliphate/Califig (or whatever today’s fashionable name is) member, supporter and hanger-on in Syria, these people are still living, plotting and acting within the civilised world, and free to move around, as proven by the recent atrocities in Paris.
And Mr. Cameron claims he wants to work toward a political solution in the region. I fail to see how this can happen when they live their lives by their religion and there are so many different religious factions squabbling with each other and vying for a place at the trough.
It hasn’t worked too well in Egypt so far.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --