Business & Finance4 mins ago
Is This Proof Of What Some Of Us Have Suspected All Along?
24 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-33 59901/H undreds -migran ts-arri ving-No rway-mo bile-ph ones-co ntainin g-image s-execu tions-s evered- heads-d ead-chi ldren-p olice-r eveal.h tml
Although even after these discoveries there are some who continue to pass it off as innocent.
/// Erik Haugland, head of Norway’s asylum programme pointed out that it was possible the images were on the phones for innocent reasons. ///
/// He explained that asylum-seekers might have the photographs in order to bear witness to the war and horrors they were fleeing in their home country, or they may have been a tactic to sneak through jihadi-controlled areas unharmed. ///
Although even after these discoveries there are some who continue to pass it off as innocent.
/// Erik Haugland, head of Norway’s asylum programme pointed out that it was possible the images were on the phones for innocent reasons. ///
/// He explained that asylum-seekers might have the photographs in order to bear witness to the war and horrors they were fleeing in their home country, or they may have been a tactic to sneak through jihadi-controlled areas unharmed. ///
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.:-p
I reckon had the tech not done it's usual job of putting typos in every other word for me to correct, I may well have posted before your correction ;-)
To be honest I can't think of a non-innocent reason to have these photos. Surely for most it is to ensure they are believed when they say what they are fleeing from ? Though they surely would have feed far enough by getting to camps over the border.
I reckon had the tech not done it's usual job of putting typos in every other word for me to correct, I may well have posted before your correction ;-)
To be honest I can't think of a non-innocent reason to have these photos. Surely for most it is to ensure they are believed when they say what they are fleeing from ? Though they surely would have feed far enough by getting to camps over the border.
Naomi and AOG - thanks for your clarifications - I must be on go-slow this morning!
I really cannot see the reason for taking and keeping photographs of such atrocities on mobile phones for the reasons Mr Haugland has given - surely anyone with a modicum of awareness knows of the atrocities carried out by IS - no-one really needs colour pictures to underline the point.
Secondly, I doubt that IS would assume that 'souvenirs' of their actions on phones constitute tacit support for their actions - not that they require it - they appear to make up their own rules for whom they do and don't arbitrarily murder - I doubt if this perceived pandering would do any good.
I wonder if Mr Haugland is trying to look for some vestige of value in these pictures? If he is, I suggest his search is utterly futile.
I really cannot see the reason for taking and keeping photographs of such atrocities on mobile phones for the reasons Mr Haugland has given - surely anyone with a modicum of awareness knows of the atrocities carried out by IS - no-one really needs colour pictures to underline the point.
Secondly, I doubt that IS would assume that 'souvenirs' of their actions on phones constitute tacit support for their actions - not that they require it - they appear to make up their own rules for whom they do and don't arbitrarily murder - I doubt if this perceived pandering would do any good.
I wonder if Mr Haugland is trying to look for some vestige of value in these pictures? If he is, I suggest his search is utterly futile.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
bazwillrun - //yeah, like the pics that paeodophiles have on their equipment...purely innocent reasons //
I don't think that analogy really flies.
Mr Haugland's reasons are on the very edge of reasonable argument, but just about hanging on - a paedophile's reasons are never anywhere near reasonable argument - ever.
I don't think that analogy really flies.
Mr Haugland's reasons are on the very edge of reasonable argument, but just about hanging on - a paedophile's reasons are never anywhere near reasonable argument - ever.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.