Shouldn't This Peaceful Silent March Be Allowed To Take Place Without Violent Opposition?

[anotheoldgit]

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/pegida-uk-hundreds-attend-birmingham-central-mosque-opposition-tommy-robinsons-anti-islam-march-1542279

[jackthehat]

andy-hughes can infer with impunity......it's up to him what he infers.

[andy-hughes]

Thank you jack.

In a civilised debate, that would obviously be the case, but when people are poised on the side-lines with their blue pencils waiting to pounce, it is simply one more provocation.

[naomi24]

andy-hughes, A civilised debate? You're having a larf! After a long absence from this thread I've posted briefly in the past hour or so simply to point out that you were mistaken - and you've told me to go and bother someone else! Charming!

[anotheoldgit]

andy-hughes

/// Because I post more than any other AB'er on the site, ///

There you go again, or was this statement also an inference? You have not posted more than any other ABer on the site, I for one can beat you.

You: 528 questions, 23,122 answers.

Myself: 6,092 questions, 28,454 answers.

/// and because you pick me up on virtually everything I post, ///

Isn't that the whole idea of a debate, it must be because you are always telling us of that fact.

I and others always have a right to pick you up on things that you have said, the matter of the difference of a poisonous snake and a Muslim, was perfectly open for discussion and criticism, after all it was you who made the analogy.

But it seems it was quite obvious that this time you had made a blunder, and so consequently was lost for words.

[anotheoldgit]

andy-hughes

/// I think AOG did infer that - so I said so. ///

You thought??????? so that makes it the truth then does it?

/// If you don't agree, that's fine, but it doesn't make me wrong on this occasion. ///

Of course it makes you wrong on this occasion and every other occasion that you only 'THINK' that I (or anyone else for that matter), inferred anything.

[agchristie]

> the matter of the difference of a poisonous snake and a Muslim, was perfectly open for discussion

I asked 3 or 4 times to Andy as to what qualities the British people had that the German and Swedish didn't have as per his claim despite later saying that he was always willing to debate a point to its conclusion.

I'm still waiting....

[anotheoldgit]

andy-hughes

/// I really don't have time to respond to pointless analysis of every word of every post I choose to offer. ///

You seem to have plenty of time to critise others.

You can't have it all one sided, do you wish to continue to accuse others of things they have not said, and hope for them to accept your remarks without any come back?

[andy-hughes]

AOG - //You thought??????? so that makes it the truth then does it? //

No - it makes it my thought - the hint is the word used.

/// If you don't agree, that's fine, but it doesn't make me wrong on this occasion. ///

Of course it makes you wrong on this occasion and every other occasion that you only 'THINK' that I (or anyone else for that matter), inferred anything. //

A thought is a thought - it doesn't infer, or imply, or state even, that I am right or wrong, it's just a thought.

[andy-hughes]

AOG - //You can't have it all one sided, do you wish to continue to accuse others of things they have not said, and hope for them to accept your remarks without any come back? //

I have not accused you of anything - that is your interpretation of what I have said, and because it is your interpretation, I am delighted to allow you the luxury of not being accused of being wrong - or indeed right - it is simply your view.

Views are free, that is why I have got so many of them!

[andy-hughes]

AG - //I'm still waiting.... //

Apologies again - you 'll need to wait for your colleagues to wind down a bit first, I will get to you if I can.

[anotheoldgit]

jack-the-hat

Before you climb into bed with him once again, this is what I earlier put, which was an attempt by me to put closure to this debate.

*** Thanks everyone for a very long and stimulating debate. ***

*** Little did I realise that when I constructed this thread it would attract so much support for Tommy Robinson and the concerns highlighted by him. ***

But that was not good enough for our Mr Hughes, so he put this:

/// It's a nice courtesy to thank people for contributing to a thread, but disingenuous to infer that everyone agreed with your original position. ///

Disingenuous indeed, I neither suggested or to use his getaway clause, 'INFERRED' that everyone agreed with my original position.

He is lying when he states that I was inferring, he can infer himself till the cows come home, but I take exception to him accusing me of inferring.

[andy-hughes]

AOG - keep your accusations of lying, and your smutty inferences, to yourself.

Your gutter attitude has no place on this site.

[jackthehat]

Do you know what 'to infer' actually means, AOG?

It is not the same thing as 'implying'...

[ummmm]

AOG - for your information Andy used to post under andy_hughes but something happened to his account and he had to re-register....

[bednobs]

once more a potentially interesting thread utterly ruined by two people

[andy-hughes]

AOG - //Don't dare to tell us to wind down, your pomposity shows no bounds. //

Point one - I was not addressing you.

Point two - if the cap fits ...

Point three, I didn't 'tell' anyone to do anything - but never let the accuracy of a post get in the way of you getting into a state.

[agchristie]

Andy - I didn't know I had any 'colleagues' on here. Anyway, I look forward to your response.

[andy-hughes]

ummmm - //AOG - for your information Andy used to post under andy_hughes but something happened to his account and he had to re-register.... //

Correct - I will, by sheer longevity, have posted and answered more questions than anyone else currently on the site - but unlike AOG, I am not wiling to get into a vanity contest over it.