Film, Media & TV1 min ago
Shouldn't This Peaceful Silent March Be Allowed To Take Place Without Violent Opposition?
720 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Mikey, I haven’t suggested you’re importing anything. I’ve asked you why you object to the arrival of a racist right wing group from Germany but not to the arrival of a far larger and far more threatening racist right wing group from the Middle East and beyond. If you don’t have an answer, just say.
Police have warned protesters attending an anti-Islam march through Birmingham on Saturday 6 February it will "come down hard" on any troublemakers, as hundreds attended the city's main mosque on Friday (5 February) to urge people not to attend. Some 370 Pegida UK supporters are expected to descend on the city to take part in a "silent walk".
March through Birmingham !. Where they held the march is out by Birmingham airport, about 10 miles from the city centre.
March through Birmingham !. Where they held the march is out by Birmingham airport, about 10 miles from the city centre.
//"They talk of the history of Birmingham [as one of cohesion and tolerance]. The truth is it was, but not any more. Now it's a hotbed for radical Islam. These council leaders never came out to condemn the marches held by Muslim extremists, like the anti-free speech protests condemning the Charlie Hebdo cartoons. They're hypocrites."//
Ah right av. I read the above quote by Robinson is all.
Ah right av. I read the above quote by Robinson is all.
Naomi, his comment 'Without Tommy Robinson, numerous Muslim grooming gangs would still be in operation without fear of arrest.' Strongly suggested (to me, at least) that Tommy was the hero of the hour and that he somehow masterminded their downfall. By the way, there are still many gangs in operation.
Zacs-Master, you’re allowing your hatred of Tommy Robinson to influence your rationality again. The suggestion is not that he is responsible for eradicating the problem – we know it continues - but simply that he brought it to the attention of the authorities. To my mind that does make him the hero of that particular hour. Regardless of what you think of him personally, someone needs to say what he’s saying and he is to be commended for having the courage to say it. When politics or personal foibles override fundamental moral principles a serious reality check is called for. Regardless of who is speaking, right is right. Islam is a blight on civilisation.
Khandro, although it’s correct to say that in the world of Islam menstruation is perceived as maturity, marriages to prepubescent girls do take place. The Koran specifically mentions prepubescent girls in its advice to men on divorce.
Khandro, although it’s correct to say that in the world of Islam menstruation is perceived as maturity, marriages to prepubescent girls do take place. The Koran specifically mentions prepubescent girls in its advice to men on divorce.
If you believe that the authorities didn't know it was going on, then that's mistake No1 on your part. Mistake No2 is assuming TR has any morals. You seem to have fallen into the trap, once again, of assuming that my intense dislike (hatred is such an ugly word) equates to a disagreement with what he's saying. I agree with what he's saying BUT for the umpteenth time, I know why he's saying it. And it's not for the moralistic reasons you suspect. Once again I'm flabbergasted that you've been taken in by him.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.