Many have said that they didn't, but what was the alternative?
On a radio phone-in this morning, one person was foolish enough to suggest that the parents of the child staged this, so that they could obtain video footage to later sell to the media and put on youtube.
A mail journalist has taken up yards of newsprint in today's edition anthropmorhising this situation, and the gorilla's behaviour, centering in the fact that for a new seconds the gorilla held the child's hand. This sort of handwringing sob-fest goes against the facts and the potential of the situation - a large and potentially lethal primate, part of a...
"The zoo said this was the first time Gorilla World has experienced a breach since the exhibit opened in 1978. The exhibit is inspected regularly by the Association of Zoos & Aquariums and the United States Department of Agriculture, and adheres to safety guidelines, according to the zoo."
/// I suspect the gorilla's decision to drag his new playmate around the place, signed his death warrant. Gut feeling is that it would have been ok not to shoot, but what do I know ? ///
And if they hadn't shot the animal how would they have persuaded it to give up his new found playmate?
That's totally untrue that we are more upset because this was a gorilla, there was an equal uproar about the lions shot in similar circumstances last week when the man jumped in to commit suicide. I don't know where you get that idea from.
Apparently there were a number of barriers he got through. That they were all damaged in the same short time, seems unlikely. Besides he'd know he wasn't supposed to go through them just damaged or not.
The tranquilliser was not an option because in the few minutes it took to work the gorilla may have been enraged by it.
Let's wait for the facts to emerge before we point the finger.
Of course it shouldn't have been shot. Eye witnesses say it was being gentle with the child, but I do blame the parents for not keeping a closer eye on him and also the zoo who should have made sure things like this don't happen, and because it did an innocent animal on the verge of extinction, died. The zoo may prosecute the parents apparently.
I think so. The best plan would have been to fire a cryogenic ray at him that would freeze him for 10 minutes, but as such things don't exist, and since they needed to take immediate action, I think they took the only course open to them.
why not AOG? when I was a kid (I know, I know they had dinosaurs in zoos then....) zoos didn’t have such solid barriers for many of the exhibits and people kept hold of their kids.
Sadly I think that the zoo had no choice. We all know that children don’t have great judgement in such matters. If what we have heard is true (Safe solid undamaged barriers) then this one is on the parents and no one else.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.