Donate SIGN UP

The First Children Have Arrived From Calais, Wow Don't Children Grow Up Fast These Days?

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 15:52 Mon 17th Oct 2016 | News
53 Answers
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3843900/First-migrant-children-arrive-UK-Calais-French-prepare-raze-Jungle-camp-ground.html

Notice also that they all seem to be males, is this something we should be wary about?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 53rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
They do grow fast, I said that the other day to my Grandson - 13 years old and 5'8".

I get a crick in my neck sometimes.
Sorry, I don't know the answer to your other part of the question.
the one in the third picture looks about 30! PMSL where are the "children"? they are adults.

So good to see the Childlike Delight on their little faces as they step onto UK soil.
There must be medical tests which can determine within a year or two someone's age.

If they're being reunited with their Parents, that's good,
but a fair few of them look like they'll be reunited with their Children imo.
'Lunar House' should be renamed 'Looney House'!
My worst fears confirmed looking at those pictures.

And are there any females?
-- answer removed --
Ask Sweden what they think of all these fit (and lets face it, healthy) young men being allowed into the UK. They are not just after the benefits.
I see no reason to doubt the ages of these kids......what reason do you have AOG ? I have a nephew who is 15 and is taller than me.
Some of them do look older than seventeen.
If they are reunited with their parents presumably social services should be involved - leaving them in Calais sounds like serious neglect to me
get real mikey one of them looks 30 to me.
No matter what their given chronological age (which is doubtful) these young males do not look like children to me. I should add that as long as the legal age for marriage in this country is 16, then anyone 16 or over should be regarded as an adult. I cannot accept marriage of children, so anyone 16 or over has to be an adult. This is a very basic flaw in all arguments. Perhaps we should change the law so that no-one under the age of 18 may marry; before that age they are children?

This needs sorting out fast.
fiction-factory, parents haven't been mentioned. Relatives have.

This is a farce.
No one under 18 may marry without parental consent. Those 16/17 may do so but they are still regarded as minors in law, so they may not buy alcohol or tobacco.
It *is* the Daily Mail, one of their gutter photographers probably "accidentally" pointed the camera the wrong way.
mikey4444
I see no reason to doubt the ages of these kids......




ha ha mikey ... did you say that with a straight face?

Answerprancer
It *is* the Daily Mail, one of their gutter photographers probably "accidentally" pointed the camera the wrong way.




See, even AP doesn't belive they are aged 14 to 17

1 to 20 of 53rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

The First Children Have Arrived From Calais, Wow Don't Children Grow Up Fast These Days?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.