News3 mins ago
La La Land.
Should there have been an extra 2 minutes silence today to mourn the crushing of democracy by High Court judges?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Just-Jude. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.the executive genuinely believed - or had been advised - that royal prerogative could be exercised in the matter of article 50. legal argument demonstrated that it couldn't.
fair enough.
what I found incredible is that effectively it took the will of a number of private individuals to notice this and point it out. where were the opposition? why was this not raised and challenged in parliament?
fair enough.
what I found incredible is that effectively it took the will of a number of private individuals to notice this and point it out. where were the opposition? why was this not raised and challenged in parliament?
^ sorry got that wrong.
I still think that this entire shambles is a roundabout way to ensure we stay in the EU. I think T May has been 'set up' to fail. I can see no other reason the government would try to trigger A50 by a means they knew would be bound to fail. Now the Judges have ruled that parliment must debate it why has the government appealed? They MUST know that unless they can give a valid reason the original Law Lords were wrong (VERY Unlikely)it is bound to fail again!
I think that it will go on and the appeal will say the same. Then the government can say ''We tried to get out but the law prevented us'' and do a U turn on Brexit to get the result they always wanted!
I at first thought of this as a joke, but the more I hear the more it looks true!
I still think that this entire shambles is a roundabout way to ensure we stay in the EU. I think T May has been 'set up' to fail. I can see no other reason the government would try to trigger A50 by a means they knew would be bound to fail. Now the Judges have ruled that parliment must debate it why has the government appealed? They MUST know that unless they can give a valid reason the original Law Lords were wrong (VERY Unlikely)it is bound to fail again!
I think that it will go on and the appeal will say the same. Then the government can say ''We tried to get out but the law prevented us'' and do a U turn on Brexit to get the result they always wanted!
I at first thought of this as a joke, but the more I hear the more it looks true!