Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
If A Christian Couple Can Be Fined For Refusing To Sell Something They Believe Is Against Their Religion Then Why No Action Against This Person?
435 Answers
OK, so IMHO religion is the root of most evil but lets forget that bit because what I am trying to understand is why there seems to be one rule for one and another for a certain other religion we all have to bend ovcer backwards to accommodate?
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-40 70144/M uslim-T esco-ca shier-r efuses- sell-bo ttle-wi ne-shop per-aga inst-re ligion. html
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
The couple who ran the B+B in Marazion refused the gay chaps because they were gay. The case has passed through the Courts, as far as it could, and the B+B owners lost every time. They were running a commercial business and they discriminated, which was found to be against the law.
The case is now finished....get over it. And it has nothing whatsoever to do with the case under debate here.
The case is now finished....get over it. And it has nothing whatsoever to do with the case under debate here.
-- answer removed --
I haven't read all of this but I have read this bit:
"The store was at fault for not following its own policy in terms of which staff members are placed where, leading to the incident in question."
I disagree. The store was at fault for having in place a policy which allows some of its staff to pick and choose what they will and will not handle. Working in a store in a retail store such as Tescos in the UK means it is very likely you will have to handle alcohol or bacon (albeit through a bottle or plastic packaging). Those who, for some inane religious reason, cannot or will not do that should seek employment elsewhere.
"The store was at fault for not following its own policy in terms of which staff members are placed where, leading to the incident in question."
I disagree. The store was at fault for having in place a policy which allows some of its staff to pick and choose what they will and will not handle. Working in a store in a retail store such as Tescos in the UK means it is very likely you will have to handle alcohol or bacon (albeit through a bottle or plastic packaging). Those who, for some inane religious reason, cannot or will not do that should seek employment elsewhere.
But Tesco and other employers may be prepared to be flexible, NJ, in order to get the overall best candidates and have staff that reflect the diversity of their customers (makes business sense)- if the employee has other skills that the employer needs a good employer will seek work around things like this -just as employers can be flexible around disabilities or women who are planning to have/do have children or older staff who can't lift heavy weights.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.