Religion & Spirituality1 min ago
Well Done Jezza.....
54 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -politi cs-3878 8440
JC is going up in my estimations all the time. Don't like his politics at all but he's a thoroughly decent chap. He sees where many cannot that Parliament must implement the democratic will of the majority. Thanks Jezza.
JC is going up in my estimations all the time. Don't like his politics at all but he's a thoroughly decent chap. He sees where many cannot that Parliament must implement the democratic will of the majority. Thanks Jezza.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Jackdaw,
There will not be 100% in favour of invoking. It is not going to hapoen, you should just recognise the fact and move on. There will be Labour rebels, Tory rebels but it will get through the commons.
This idea that there should be total unanamous vote to invoke when the vote was relatively close and 48% diasagreed is perverse. We live in a democracy, and there will ge some disent about invoking, and that is goid.
There will not be 100% in favour of invoking. It is not going to hapoen, you should just recognise the fact and move on. There will be Labour rebels, Tory rebels but it will get through the commons.
This idea that there should be total unanamous vote to invoke when the vote was relatively close and 48% diasagreed is perverse. We live in a democracy, and there will ge some disent about invoking, and that is goid.
Why do people always include those that dont vote for something as a signal it they were on 'thier side'
If you dont vote you dont give a monkeys either way; as Jack says.
True enough Gromitit wont, nor should be 100%. However I'm not sure how represetning your "local constituency" should be potentially used to override the democratic will of the people?
If you dont vote you dont give a monkeys either way; as Jack says.
True enough Gromitit wont, nor should be 100%. However I'm not sure how represetning your "local constituency" should be potentially used to override the democratic will of the people?
“So invoking A50 should not ne a rubber stamping exercise, because less than half the population wanted ito leave.”
Er..no. We’re back to flawed logic. You cannot assume that those who did not vote wish to remain. People do not vote for all sorts of reasons. If you wanted to be sure of remaining the best way to do so was to vote. If all those who didn’t vote wanted to remain they have only themselves to blame for the result. It doesn’t matter as far as this question goes but I really don’t know why such ridiculous reasoning prevails.
Er..no. We’re back to flawed logic. You cannot assume that those who did not vote wish to remain. People do not vote for all sorts of reasons. If you wanted to be sure of remaining the best way to do so was to vote. If all those who didn’t vote wanted to remain they have only themselves to blame for the result. It doesn’t matter as far as this question goes but I really don’t know why such ridiculous reasoning prevails.