Donate SIGN UP

Thousands Of Gay Men Pardoned For Past Convictions

Avatar Image
mikey4444 | 21:02 Tue 31st Jan 2017 | News
66 Answers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38814338

Great news for the families of these men. They should never have been subject to this bigotry in the first place.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 66rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Avatar Image
Absolutely appalling how gay people were treated in those years and many will say too little, too late, but if the families get some kind of closure over this, that can't be a bad thing I suppose. Doesn't change the fact that it should never have happened in the first place, as you quite rightly mention, mikey.
21:12 Tue 31st Jan 2017
Important milestone indeed.
There have been a number of law changes which have effectively decriminalised previously illegal practices. I see no pardons for anything else. Why is this so special?

These activities were illegal under the legislation prevailing at the time and they were undertaken knowing that. No pardons are justified.
Absolutely appalling how gay people were treated in those years and many will say too little, too late, but if the families get some kind of closure over this, that can't be a bad thing I suppose.
Doesn't change the fact that it should never have happened in the first place, as you quite rightly mention, mikey.
Changing th elaw was the important milestone. Pardons are just meaningless platitudes.

Drivel, they were convicted under the Law as it stood at the time.
They were Criminals.
Because the Law changed that does not make them innocent, it just means no-one else is convicted. All this apologising for things that happened in the past is nonsense.
I'm glad the crime has been eradicated, but I can't see what good it will do to have an official pardon. What does an official pardon mean? Does the family get a certificate? :/
I don't know what the families of these men have gone through, but hopefully the fact that homosexuality isn't even a thing to be worried about now is some comfort to them.

I think people know Turing for his maths brain and the Enigma decrypting rather than his homosexuality.
To me it is obvious why these men have been pardoned.
There are still men living who will greatly appreciate this move.
Normally I respect what New Judge says, but on this I wholeheartedly disagree. The law was wrong.

Now that it has been put right it is only right that victims of the law are pardoned, if only for the familys' benefit.

I would go further that my understanding of the word pardon is that they are forgiven. That's not enough, as it suggests they are still thought to have done wrong.
Yeh and me hc. Not for the peace of mind of the man in the street either. Perhaps we can "pardon" a few paras or marines. Naah thought not. A pardon for the truly innocent has just been tarnished, which is the aim of they who would lessen the difference between right and wrong.
Don’t misunderstand me Hopkirk. I fully accept that the law was wrong. I’d go further than that and say it was absolutely no business of any State what consenting adults get up to in their private lives. That isn’t my point.

Pardons are for people who were wrongly convicted. These people were properly convicted under the law at the time. The law was wrong (as many laws were). But a pardon is not appropriate. A pardon indicates that the person pardoned was innocent. That is not the case here and the person “pardoned” is simply being issued to assuage the “third party” guilt that people today have apparently taken on for actions of people in the past.
Yes they have had a very hard time.
This subject has been debated previously, and my personal view has not changed - these men should not have been pardoned for their offences.

I entirely appreciate that the law was a bad law, but that does not mean that because it was a bad law, that it is invalidated by the passage of time.

Were that the case, then there would be endless other examples of bad law that should see its convictions quashed - and that is not only not practical, in my view it I not legally or morally right.

It I were convicted for speeding and forty miles an hour in a thirty zone, and then years later, the limit was amended to fort, meaning I would not be convicted today, does that mean my endorsement is removed and my fine reimbursed? No, and I would not expect it to be so - I was convicted under the law at the time, and that is how the law operates.

We cannot re-write history to take into account our greater humanity and understanding, what is done is done.

Simply because we as a society are enlightened enough to feel shame over our bad laws does not mean that the criminals convicted under it were not guilty. Clearly they were - and a 'pardon' does not alter that fact.
I agree Mikey.
I agree too.

Andy, I think your analogy of you breaking a speed limit to someone happening to be gay is a very poor one.
I dont think we should keep looking back and banging on how things were wrong at the time. As pointed out above they were criminals at that point in time and that is the way it is. It is a miss use of the pardon IMHO.
They were only criminals because of ignorance. Of course they should be pardoned.
Question Author
Andy......Your analogy of the speeding fine doesn't really make much sense.

In your example, there was a good reason why 30mph was chosen at the time, for public safety. Maybe that road has been reassessed now, thus causing a higher mph to be applied. We have many roads in my locale that now have 20mph limits, when previously they had 30mph limits. Circumstances change.

The law on sexual acts between consenting men could never be justified in the first place, as no one was in danger. It was applied because of ignorance and bigotry, a bigotry that survived long into my lifetime and is still alive in some peoples minds now.

This move sends an important signal, in that what people get up to in bed is none of anybody else's business, not should it ever have been. It didn't "cure" men of homosexuality, as it didn't with Turing, only make them into men with a criminal record, and in some cases their reputations were ruined for ever as a result.

I applaud this move wholeheartedly.
As enlightenment dawns, will those transported to the colonies for such crimes as stealing bread be revisited and assessed in hindsight or is that treatment reserved for those with a parade?
Stealing bread? Speeding?

How did you get to those comparisons?

1 to 20 of 66rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Thousands Of Gay Men Pardoned For Past Convictions

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.