Body & Soul1 min ago
Senate Panel Rejects Trump Wiretap Claim
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/wo rld-us- canada- 3929743 9
So where does Trump go from here ?
He reminds me of the story of the little boy who cried wolf....he has told so many lies over the last few months that one day, he is going to come out with something true, but nobody is going to believe him. He is a fantasist.
So where does Trump go from here ?
He reminds me of the story of the little boy who cried wolf....he has told so many lies over the last few months that one day, he is going to come out with something true, but nobody is going to believe him. He is a fantasist.
Answers
"failure to prove something isn't in itself proof that an allegation was false. " This is exactly what I said yesterday. That is what makes this sort of wild allegations so pernicious. Trump read something on Breitbart, put 2 and 2 together and made 911 ...
18:21 Thu 16th Mar 2017
-- answer removed --
This was reported on a Democrat website yesterday but I didn't like to post it as I wanted to be sure it wasn't those pesky Kenyan-lovers up to no good again :-)
Where does Trump go from here? Probably nowhere: there'll be more nonsense, flailing, wild accusations of conspiracy against him.
Meanwhile the impeachment evidence will continue to be gathered, and Senator Graham's inquiry into the Kremlin connections will carry on quietly amidst all the shouting.
Where does Trump go from here? Probably nowhere: there'll be more nonsense, flailing, wild accusations of conspiracy against him.
Meanwhile the impeachment evidence will continue to be gathered, and Senator Graham's inquiry into the Kremlin connections will carry on quietly amidst all the shouting.
-- answer removed --
Lynn....." that gets things done"
Gets what done exactly ? He has been defeated in the Courts over this issue and it appears to be happening again. He has lost some very new Staff, very quickly after being appointed.
He has still to bring a Bill before Congress, relying instead on these Executive Orders, the ones that the Courts keep overturning.
You appear to be living in the same fantasy world as he does !
Gets what done exactly ? He has been defeated in the Courts over this issue and it appears to be happening again. He has lost some very new Staff, very quickly after being appointed.
He has still to bring a Bill before Congress, relying instead on these Executive Orders, the ones that the Courts keep overturning.
You appear to be living in the same fantasy world as he does !
" The wiretap was revealed by Wikileaks"
Was it? I don't think it was.
Oddly though one thing that wilikleaks DID "reveal" in the middle of all the Samsung and iPhone stuff was ...:
The CIA has a branch dedicated to guess what:
Framing Russia for hacking activities
You couldn't make it up - except I think someone just did :-)
Was it? I don't think it was.
Oddly though one thing that wilikleaks DID "reveal" in the middle of all the Samsung and iPhone stuff was ...:
The CIA has a branch dedicated to guess what:
Framing Russia for hacking activities
You couldn't make it up - except I think someone just did :-)
well surprisingly - I think Trump has a point
Flynn had to go because of his Russian contacts
and did FLynn say "Mr President I have contacted the Kremlin and before you say anything - I gotta go"
Trump: first on the left ....
Didnt the FBI and CIA go along to Trump and say Mr President one of your trusted lootenants ( Trump: "first on the left") has been phoning the ruskies
and Flynn said - no I havent - oh OK I might have done
and Trump said 'hey Flynn you gartta go or else I go'
and FLynnsaid : 'o I believe in the White House it is first on the left Mr President'
and how would the CIA and FBI know ?
unless they had been phone tapping ?
as for Obama ordering it
BS - it has to go thro the FISC - court especially set up to give warrants for tapping
Flynn had to go because of his Russian contacts
and did FLynn say "Mr President I have contacted the Kremlin and before you say anything - I gotta go"
Trump: first on the left ....
Didnt the FBI and CIA go along to Trump and say Mr President one of your trusted lootenants ( Trump: "first on the left") has been phoning the ruskies
and Flynn said - no I havent - oh OK I might have done
and Trump said 'hey Flynn you gartta go or else I go'
and FLynnsaid : 'o I believe in the White House it is first on the left Mr President'
and how would the CIA and FBI know ?
unless they had been phone tapping ?
as for Obama ordering it
BS - it has to go thro the FISC - court especially set up to give warrants for tapping
The point to me is that Trump's undisciplined tweets give - quite unnecessarily - hostages to fortune. A pointless distraction which adds a further impediment (as if one more were needed) to the implementation of his policies.
If the accusation is false don't say it. If the accusation is true (or seems likely) file away for future use.
If the accusation is false don't say it. If the accusation is true (or seems likely) file away for future use.
LATEST DEVELOPMENT:
The White House is now claiming that Obama contacted GCHQ (yes - our very own spy agency) and got THEM to provide the wire tap, thereby bypassing the CIA and FBI.
Seriously - Sean Spicer is claiming this.
GCHQ have released this statement:
[i]Recent allegations made by media commentator Judge Andrew Napolitano about GCHQ being asked to conduct "wire tapping" against the then President Elect are nonsense. They are utterly ridiculous and should be ignored.'[i]
The White House is now claiming that Obama contacted GCHQ (yes - our very own spy agency) and got THEM to provide the wire tap, thereby bypassing the CIA and FBI.
Seriously - Sean Spicer is claiming this.
GCHQ have released this statement:
[i]Recent allegations made by media commentator Judge Andrew Napolitano about GCHQ being asked to conduct "wire tapping" against the then President Elect are nonsense. They are utterly ridiculous and should be ignored.'[i]
So to be clear...
Trump alleges something. Provides no proof (there is nothing about Trump tower being tapped in the Vault 7 leaks, assuming they are genuine).
Senators in his party investigate. Find no proof.
Therefore it is true?
Should I be relieved or terrified that Mr. Trump has the power to dictate reality through tweets?
Trump alleges something. Provides no proof (there is nothing about Trump tower being tapped in the Vault 7 leaks, assuming they are genuine).
Senators in his party investigate. Find no proof.
Therefore it is true?
Should I be relieved or terrified that Mr. Trump has the power to dictate reality through tweets?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.