Crosswords7 mins ago
Fed Up With The Usual Hype Fed To Us By Our Media? Then Here Is A Piece That Tells It Exactly How It Is.
120 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/d ebate/a rticle- 4571882 /We-war -writes -RICHAR D-LITTL EJOHN.h tml
/// 'They have encouraged the pernicious doctrine of 'multiculturalism' — which is just a fancy word for apartheid and has created vast, monocultural Muslim ghettoes in our great cities . . . ///
/// 'The politicians have opened the floodgates to mass immigration without insisting on integration. They pretend that every culture, no matter how medieval and barbaric, is worthy of equal respect. ///
/// 'They have encouraged the pernicious doctrine of 'multiculturalism' — which is just a fancy word for apartheid and has created vast, monocultural Muslim ghettoes in our great cities . . . ///
/// 'The politicians have opened the floodgates to mass immigration without insisting on integration. They pretend that every culture, no matter how medieval and barbaric, is worthy of equal respect. ///
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.AOG - // Show me where I have gone wrong and if I have then I apologise and run away with my tail between my legs. //
Once again you have either failed to read, or ignored my post today when yet again for the umpteenth time, I advised you that I do not deal with posts which attack me personally – Moderators are not permitted to take personal action in that way.
So now the Editor has confirmed that it was he, not I who edited the posts – I do not have the facilty to edit posts, no Moderator does, just the editorial team.
I am not fussed whether or not you run anywhere, or where you place your tail, but I look forward to your apology, which as a gentleman, I am sure will be happy to print with the same eagerness with which you make your personal attacks.
Thank you.
Once again you have either failed to read, or ignored my post today when yet again for the umpteenth time, I advised you that I do not deal with posts which attack me personally – Moderators are not permitted to take personal action in that way.
So now the Editor has confirmed that it was he, not I who edited the posts – I do not have the facilty to edit posts, no Moderator does, just the editorial team.
I am not fussed whether or not you run anywhere, or where you place your tail, but I look forward to your apology, which as a gentleman, I am sure will be happy to print with the same eagerness with which you make your personal attacks.
Thank you.
Naomi - //andy-hughes, when I want your advice I'll ask for it. //
Then I am sure you will be delighted to practice what you preach.
// I'd rather give my opinion openly and honestly so that everyone can see it - if it's all the same to you. //
Never an argument from me on that score.
// Thank you. //
You are most welcome, as always.
Then I am sure you will be delighted to practice what you preach.
// I'd rather give my opinion openly and honestly so that everyone can see it - if it's all the same to you. //
Never an argument from me on that score.
// Thank you. //
You are most welcome, as always.
-- answer removed --
// Posts can get edited?????? //
Nigh can be a first amendment absolutist (my new phrase) and stands or falls by her statements at least when she is talking
but I think the sense of the thread ( er yes I really did write that) is better served if some answers are edited rather than zapped
otherwise you get answer removed/ answer remived - and think
blimey what was that about ? anything good ?
and so it was the great Fred Puli's contribution was removed on half way pleading ( galbraith plea - your honour the crown's case is no good can you dismiss and we can all go home early for tea) - which was kinduva pity because Fred P was a ( now deceased ) criminal QC
Nigh can be a first amendment absolutist (my new phrase) and stands or falls by her statements at least when she is talking
but I think the sense of the thread ( er yes I really did write that) is better served if some answers are edited rather than zapped
otherwise you get answer removed/ answer remived - and think
blimey what was that about ? anything good ?
and so it was the great Fred Puli's contribution was removed on half way pleading ( galbraith plea - your honour the crown's case is no good can you dismiss and we can all go home early for tea) - which was kinduva pity because Fred P was a ( now deceased ) criminal QC
Zacs - // I see AH decided to join in with AOG in debating after all. How interesting. //
Not quite.
AOG decided not to engage with me – his choice, however, I never stopped engaging with him, replying to his posts regularly, although not receiving a response.
Today, he decided to address me directly, but having fielded a personal insult aimed at me today, I declined to pursue a dialogue, and that is where we stand.
Speaking personally, I shall continue to address posts to AOG as and when I feel they require a response, obviously I cannot confirm if he will do the same.
Not quite.
AOG decided not to engage with me – his choice, however, I never stopped engaging with him, replying to his posts regularly, although not receiving a response.
Today, he decided to address me directly, but having fielded a personal insult aimed at me today, I declined to pursue a dialogue, and that is where we stand.
Speaking personally, I shall continue to address posts to AOG as and when I feel they require a response, obviously I cannot confirm if he will do the same.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.