Motoring4 mins ago
Six Months Imprisonment For Hitting Someone With A Pack Of Bacon, Is That Too Harsh?
119 Answers
http://
While physical attacks of any sort should be condemned and punished, did this thug deserve imprisonment?
Interesting to note that it is reported that he was jailed for racially aggravated assault and then later the police vowed to crack down on race hate attacks.
Muslims are not a race.
While physical attacks of any sort should be condemned and punished, did this thug deserve imprisonment?
Interesting to note that it is reported that he was jailed for racially aggravated assault and then later the police vowed to crack down on race hate attacks.
Muslims are not a race.
Answers
The question was: 'Does he deserve imprisonment
11:00 Fri 30th Jun 2017
dannyk13
/// I did not say that Islam is a race. said that the attack was racial. ///
Please explain why this was a racist attack?
Is there proof somewhere that I have missed, that says he attacked the girl because she happened to come from a different race of people.
In his deranged mind the girl was attacked because he recognised her as Muslim, due I suppose by her dress and not by her skin colour.
/// I did not say that Islam is a race. said that the attack was racial. ///
Please explain why this was a racist attack?
Is there proof somewhere that I have missed, that says he attacked the girl because she happened to come from a different race of people.
In his deranged mind the girl was attacked because he recognised her as Muslim, due I suppose by her dress and not by her skin colour.
I don't know all the law or the reason for the wordings, but these people do - have a browse it may help.
http://
http://
Islay
/// Are you saying then that they were justified in attacking this young girl because of what she was wearing? ///
I have never said anyone was justified to carry out such attacks no matter what they are wearing, but some white girls have been in some mainly Muslim areas.
If you had read my posts and not interpreted them into what you wished they had said. The girl was most likely chosen for the attack because the thug was upset at past terrorists attacks carried out in the name of ISIS, and he happened to have a bee in his bonnet, and that was the reason he chose bacon to attack the girl, knowing Muslim's hatred of pigs.
/// Are you saying then that they were justified in attacking this young girl because of what she was wearing? ///
I have never said anyone was justified to carry out such attacks no matter what they are wearing, but some white girls have been in some mainly Muslim areas.
If you had read my posts and not interpreted them into what you wished they had said. The girl was most likely chosen for the attack because the thug was upset at past terrorists attacks carried out in the name of ISIS, and he happened to have a bee in his bonnet, and that was the reason he chose bacon to attack the girl, knowing Muslim's hatred of pigs.
See again you seem to be justifing the attack by adding this little beaut of a quote
//no matter what they are wearing, but some white girls have been in some mainly Muslim areas. //
It appears that you are saying that as it has 'apparently' happened to a white girl because of what she is wearing then its tit for tat!
Pretty low in my opinion!
//no matter what they are wearing, but some white girls have been in some mainly Muslim areas. //
It appears that you are saying that as it has 'apparently' happened to a white girl because of what she is wearing then its tit for tat!
Pretty low in my opinion!
sp1814
I would wish to see all attacks on people or animals carry jail sentences or even worse, but now days such punishments are not allowed.
But one has to be both practical and even handed.
1/ Which has already been pointed out,the jails are overflowing already
2/ Sentences should be levelled at the seriousness of the attacks, a slap in the face with a pack of bacon, being amongst the least serious.
3/ Sentences should be equal for all, and judging by today's sentences there are plenty of examples where they are not, one being that women are treated more lenient than men.
I would wish to see all attacks on people or animals carry jail sentences or even worse, but now days such punishments are not allowed.
But one has to be both practical and even handed.
1/ Which has already been pointed out,the jails are overflowing already
2/ Sentences should be levelled at the seriousness of the attacks, a slap in the face with a pack of bacon, being amongst the least serious.
3/ Sentences should be equal for all, and judging by today's sentences there are plenty of examples where they are not, one being that women are treated more lenient than men.
AOG
You wrote:
//The girl was most likely chosen for the attack because the thug was upset at past terrorists attacks carried out in the name of ISIS//
I'll correct that:
//The girl was most likely chosen for the attack because the thug was upset at past terrorists attacks carried out in the name of ISIS, and he must've been pretty confident that a teenage girl would not be able to retaliate, as opposed to a big strapping bloke - because he's a coward"
I think there's a trend here with these thugs. They go for girls and women.
...apart from the bloke on that episode of '24 Hours In Police Custody' who randomly chose an Indian bloke to attack.
He waited for this chap to come out of a lift in a hotel in Luton and smashed him in the face with a fire extinguisher.
Did you see it?
The inside of the lift was covered in blood. I had to stop watching - it was too upsetting.
Oh, and the Indian bloke was a Hindu, not Muslim.
You wrote:
//The girl was most likely chosen for the attack because the thug was upset at past terrorists attacks carried out in the name of ISIS//
I'll correct that:
//The girl was most likely chosen for the attack because the thug was upset at past terrorists attacks carried out in the name of ISIS, and he must've been pretty confident that a teenage girl would not be able to retaliate, as opposed to a big strapping bloke - because he's a coward"
I think there's a trend here with these thugs. They go for girls and women.
...apart from the bloke on that episode of '24 Hours In Police Custody' who randomly chose an Indian bloke to attack.
He waited for this chap to come out of a lift in a hotel in Luton and smashed him in the face with a fire extinguisher.
Did you see it?
The inside of the lift was covered in blood. I had to stop watching - it was too upsetting.
Oh, and the Indian bloke was a Hindu, not Muslim.
sp1814
Add to it all you like sp, you are not telling me anything that I can't fathom out myself.
It is obvious that if a burly man attacks a girl, it is because he can't expect a retaliating attack.
Can't see the point of you introducing an episode of '24 Hours In Police Custody' doesn't add anything to the debate at all in my opinion.
And no I didn't see it.
Add to it all you like sp, you are not telling me anything that I can't fathom out myself.
It is obvious that if a burly man attacks a girl, it is because he can't expect a retaliating attack.
Can't see the point of you introducing an episode of '24 Hours In Police Custody' doesn't add anything to the debate at all in my opinion.
And no I didn't see it.
Latest Posts
Film, Media & TV6 mins ago
ChatterBank26 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles31 mins ago
Well At Least Sir Kier Is Topping One...
News34 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.