ChatterBank6 mins ago
Should Britain Pay €100 Billion Divorce Bill?
or should Theresa simply walk away?
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/201 7/07/01 /theres a-may-c ould-st orm-bre xit-tal ks-divo rce-bil l/#comm ents
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.What should occur depends on what evidence there is for agreements/contracts entered into that show continued financial responsibility after we have left. Anything not clearly committed to in that way can not form part of any continuing payment. I may be bring cynical but is my suspicion that the EU is trying it on. It's up to them to prove continued responsibility otherwise nothing is payable.
Perhaps cloverjo is a Harry Potter reader? This makes fascinating reading (and it's all there OG)
https:/ /www.sp ectator .co.uk/ 2017/06 /harry- potter- and-the -millen nial-mi nd/
https:/
Cammeran left because he wanted to remain in the EU and knew 1. He lost so has also lost 'the faith of the people' 2. HE didn't want to leave (the EU) so didn't want to do the negotiating because HE knew that no one would or even could trust him to negotiate on our behalf. Look what a carp job he did of his renegotiations?
The only thing he did wrong was leave without triggering A50 as he said he would before he lost.
The only thing he did wrong was leave without triggering A50 as he said he would before he lost.
The rules are simple. Leaving us just leaving. Negotiations for the future are about discussing suggested arrangements, getting the best deal you can, and not allowing the other side to walk all over you. Red lines are useful for that, provided they are drawn in the right place. For example we didn't leave to still not have control of our borders, nor have a foreign group/court continue to make decisions related to our national law.
Cameron was wrong to call a referendum on this topic, it was always going to be hijacked by the single issue, anti-immigration lobby with no thought about the consequences. Many I know who voted to leave had no idea of what would happen because it was never discussed and voted as a protest against immigration, not expecting to win but to give the Government a fright. Such momentous decisions should never be put to a referendum, that's what we have elections for.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.