Quizzes & Puzzles52 mins ago
When Are We Going To Bring Back Capital Punishment For Animals Like This?
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-46 71912/F ive-yea r-old-b attered -mother -s-boyf riend.h tml
I'm saddened and shocked and in cases like this where you act like an animal the punishment should be like those for a wild killer animal, the words "Sharia law" spring to mind and if you're far right or an islamaphobe replace the word "Sharia" with "Medieval" as those muslims sure know how to meat out justice where we tickle our criminals with cotton wool gloves and "Balsa wood" sentences
I'm saddened and shocked and in cases like this where you act like an animal the punishment should be like those for a wild killer animal, the words "Sharia law" spring to mind and if you're far right or an islamaphobe replace the word "Sharia" with "Medieval" as those muslims sure know how to meat out justice where we tickle our criminals with cotton wool gloves and "Balsa wood" sentences
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Quangoid. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ. o god I love these real life debates on AB
There is no appetite for the return of capital punishment
as a result of mistakes on the last group of terrorists
( virtually no mainland convicted IRA bomber had 'done it' - bar the Balcombe St gang - the rather gullible LCJ even regretted at the time he couldnt hang them - and then when he was told the police had lied to him said, " it is not my fault if the police choose to lie" ) oopsie
There is no appetite for the return of capital punishment
as a result of mistakes on the last group of terrorists
( virtually no mainland convicted IRA bomber had 'done it' - bar the Balcombe St gang - the rather gullible LCJ even regretted at the time he couldnt hang them - and then when he was told the police had lied to him said, " it is not my fault if the police choose to lie" ) oopsie
Look at my previous posts! I have done this one to death.
To put it simply there is ONLY ONE possible sentence for murder , that is 'Life'. The Judge has to set a 'tariff' for a life sentence. Until the tariff has been served the offender can not even start the process of applying to the parole board for possible release 'on licence'. The worse the crime the longer the tariff!
A 'lifer' can never be free in the way that a person who serves a determinate sentence can. They can always be returned to jail without trial if they break any of the terms of the release licence.
In this way life does mean Life !
Finally all other prisoners and warders HATE child murderers , this guy's life will be a living hell. He can expect to find glass splinters and razor blades hidden in his food, he may well be 'napalmed'.
(Look at my previous posts to see what I mean.)
Warders will 'accidently on purpose' leave him in a position where other inmates can harm him, the other inmates will be competing to see who can get to him first .
To put it simply there is ONLY ONE possible sentence for murder , that is 'Life'. The Judge has to set a 'tariff' for a life sentence. Until the tariff has been served the offender can not even start the process of applying to the parole board for possible release 'on licence'. The worse the crime the longer the tariff!
A 'lifer' can never be free in the way that a person who serves a determinate sentence can. They can always be returned to jail without trial if they break any of the terms of the release licence.
In this way life does mean Life !
Finally all other prisoners and warders HATE child murderers , this guy's life will be a living hell. He can expect to find glass splinters and razor blades hidden in his food, he may well be 'napalmed'.
(Look at my previous posts to see what I mean.)
Warders will 'accidently on purpose' leave him in a position where other inmates can harm him, the other inmates will be competing to see who can get to him first .
// Look at my previous posts! I have done this one to death. // ed
in fact Ed you thought to yourself - Hang it! I've exhausted......
yes every day something the same
( semper aliquid novum ex Africa - always something new from Africa - but I have changed it a bit )
Do you remember the daily Brexit thread - sometimes more than one if the average ABer was feeling frisky ?
it is the same - troll-food I call it
[yeah but no but - "what does the Latin mean?" - quips one AB wag)
in fact Ed you thought to yourself - Hang it! I've exhausted......
yes every day something the same
( semper aliquid novum ex Africa - always something new from Africa - but I have changed it a bit )
Do you remember the daily Brexit thread - sometimes more than one if the average ABer was feeling frisky ?
it is the same - troll-food I call it
[yeah but no but - "what does the Latin mean?" - quips one AB wag)
Quangoid - you do seem to very angry - I am not sure if this is you, or just that certain issues get you going.
I think that confusing people who are against CP with `hand wringers`is a mistake because it infers that an extreme position at either end of the argument is the only possible way to view this.
As I see it, capital punishment is not `punishment`at all, since the concept of punishment is to ensure that the experience means that the perpetrator will not carry out the same act again - tricky if they are murdered before they get a chance to show that any punishment has actually had the desired effect.
Capital punishment is not a deterrent, simply because no-one who commits a capital crime considers that they will even be caught, much less convicted and executed. That requires rational logical thinking which is utterly at odds with the sort of crime that attract serious levels of redress.
So you are left with what capital punishment actually is - which is revenge, and entirely understandable human reaction to horrible crimes, but not the action of a civilized society.
I cannot support the murder of a criminal, because that makes me, by default, a murderer too. I am perfectly happy for my taxes to be paid to incarcerate a criminal for the time the law decides - but to take a life is simply not an acceptable way to deal with anyone, because murder is still murder, even if you do it inhumanely by any of the proscribed execution methods on the planet.
I am not a `hand wringer`- but I don;t like people being murdered on my behalf either.
I think that confusing people who are against CP with `hand wringers`is a mistake because it infers that an extreme position at either end of the argument is the only possible way to view this.
As I see it, capital punishment is not `punishment`at all, since the concept of punishment is to ensure that the experience means that the perpetrator will not carry out the same act again - tricky if they are murdered before they get a chance to show that any punishment has actually had the desired effect.
Capital punishment is not a deterrent, simply because no-one who commits a capital crime considers that they will even be caught, much less convicted and executed. That requires rational logical thinking which is utterly at odds with the sort of crime that attract serious levels of redress.
So you are left with what capital punishment actually is - which is revenge, and entirely understandable human reaction to horrible crimes, but not the action of a civilized society.
I cannot support the murder of a criminal, because that makes me, by default, a murderer too. I am perfectly happy for my taxes to be paid to incarcerate a criminal for the time the law decides - but to take a life is simply not an acceptable way to deal with anyone, because murder is still murder, even if you do it inhumanely by any of the proscribed execution methods on the planet.
I am not a `hand wringer`- but I don;t like people being murdered on my behalf either.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.