News0 min ago
Damian Green....did He Or Didn't He ?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ. "inextricably mixed up with his normal use of the thing, on a minute by minute basis ? "
Mikey, this may all come down to what his normal use is or was. My impression is that these senior people and ministers have drones (researchers) who do all their clerical stuff. It's also a fact that that most senior people in commerce have similar people using their bosses computers and emails etc on their behalf. My educated guess is that if you asked Damien Green or any other Minister to fish out some facts from a database and present it as a graph they couldn't do it, or if they could it would take them all day.
Most senior people have never had the time to sit for hours at computers, indeed I've known some who never used them at all but just delegated as needed.
Mikey, this may all come down to what his normal use is or was. My impression is that these senior people and ministers have drones (researchers) who do all their clerical stuff. It's also a fact that that most senior people in commerce have similar people using their bosses computers and emails etc on their behalf. My educated guess is that if you asked Damien Green or any other Minister to fish out some facts from a database and present it as a graph they couldn't do it, or if they could it would take them all day.
Most senior people have never had the time to sit for hours at computers, indeed I've known some who never used them at all but just delegated as needed.
Andy Hughes - unlikely, but if he let a few people have his passwords etc. then the the responsibility is his, but that isn't the same as him downloading the stuff, which he has consistently denied. I think this all occurred some time ago, which may complicate things further, staffwise. As a minister, for him to point the finger at a minion without evidence or proof would be worse than the original "offence"
RobNorth - Having been employed by a company which issued passwords to all PC users, the rule was never to pass your password on, because any actions under your password were your responsibility.
If that went for an office drone like me, I'd like to think it went rather more for an MP who is a government minister.
I haven't followed this story in the media, but has Mr Green offered any defence / explanation for this?
Something as simple as "I am not the only person with access to my computer ..." would do the trick.
If that went for an office drone like me, I'd like to think it went rather more for an MP who is a government minister.
I haven't followed this story in the media, but has Mr Green offered any defence / explanation for this?
Something as simple as "I am not the only person with access to my computer ..." would do the trick.
Jackdaw - // I find RobNorth's explanation highly plausible. //
I find it the exact opposite.
Any MP and certainly a Minister will have a PC and use it constantly.
They will not be the only people in their department using a PC, but the notion that Mr Green has staff to read his reports, write his reports, answer and send his e-mails, and do all that on his own password-protected computer simply does not stand up.
I find it the exact opposite.
Any MP and certainly a Minister will have a PC and use it constantly.
They will not be the only people in their department using a PC, but the notion that Mr Green has staff to read his reports, write his reports, answer and send his e-mails, and do all that on his own password-protected computer simply does not stand up.
Nowhere does it say he has done anything illegal
///Neil Lewis examined the device during a 2008 inquiry into government leaks and has not spoken publicly before.///
///He said "thousands" of thumbnail images of legal pornography were on it.///
///The pornography was not "extreme", as some reports have suggested, and did not contain images of children or abuse///
And I have not seen it stated that he downloaded anything, except by certain posters on AB, only that he had viewed the Sites in the same way that we view AB>
///Neil Lewis examined the device during a 2008 inquiry into government leaks and has not spoken publicly before.///
///He said "thousands" of thumbnail images of legal pornography were on it.///
///The pornography was not "extreme", as some reports have suggested, and did not contain images of children or abuse///
And I have not seen it stated that he downloaded anything, except by certain posters on AB, only that he had viewed the Sites in the same way that we view AB>
Baldric - // Nowhere does it say he has done anything illegal //
I don't think that is the issue.
It is not that Mr Green has been looking at legal pornography, that is the free choice of an adult in this country.
The issue is that he was doing it on an office computer during office hours, and that is unacceptable behaviour for an MP - it is as simple as that.
I don't think that is the issue.
It is not that Mr Green has been looking at legal pornography, that is the free choice of an adult in this country.
The issue is that he was doing it on an office computer during office hours, and that is unacceptable behaviour for an MP - it is as simple as that.
you mean if I get an email from [email protected] - it may NOT be from our very own Andy Hughes ?
I am shocked
I really am
so someone else has been accessing and using Dame's computer ?
can I say .... duh ?
as it (the porn) is all meant to be legal
Dame is under no duty to say if he knows who did it
I am shocked
I really am
so someone else has been accessing and using Dame's computer ?
can I say .... duh ?
as it (the porn) is all meant to be legal
Dame is under no duty to say if he knows who did it
Rob - // Andy Hughes
I too was employed by firm which had rules on password security, also rules on claiming expenses..... //
If I interperet correctly, you are referring to the obvious expenses frauds as an indication that MP's don't follow rules - a fair point.
However, I would suggest that Mr Green holding his hands up to issuing his password to other staff, with attendent consequences, would still be a better way to go than staying tight-lipped, and offering no defence to the accusations levelled against him - even if they are not based on illegal activities.
I too was employed by firm which had rules on password security, also rules on claiming expenses..... //
If I interperet correctly, you are referring to the obvious expenses frauds as an indication that MP's don't follow rules - a fair point.
However, I would suggest that Mr Green holding his hands up to issuing his password to other staff, with attendent consequences, would still be a better way to go than staying tight-lipped, and offering no defence to the accusations levelled against him - even if they are not based on illegal activities.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.