^^^good for you - be loud and proud, however, you might receive some condescending pity from those who scorn the Mail because they know better than you.
I thought Branson sued the NHS because the welched on a contract and if that is the case should he have let them get away with it just because they are the sainted NHS?
As for Branson refusing to sell the Daily Mail - his business his choice.
stranger things have happened. The big wigs at the Mail think this is censorship> I wonder at that myself, but as someone said many look on laptops, phones for their news these days anyway.
It is censorship. That was the reason given by Virgin themselves. That's why there's debate over moral priorities. A company can sell what it wishes on the one hand, it ought not be censoring voices they disapprove of on the other. It near the top of the slippery slope.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.