ChatterBank3 mins ago
Who Next
I bet most public figures are busy racking their brains , trying to remember any incident in the past that could could around to bite them on the a ss .
These must be anxious times for some
( Not that for one minute i'm saying that he is or isn't guilty )
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/en tertain ment-ar ts-4274 5150
These must be anxious times for some
( Not that for one minute i'm saying that he is or isn't guilty )
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bazile. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ."She claims he used sexual language in front of her, including openly discussing extra-marital affairs, while she was running the firm's New York office."
Gawd give me strength. It is stupid claims like this that belittle the real problem like rape.
"She alleged he masturbated in front of her during a one-on-one script meeting in his apartment in 1989 and that she rushed out, feeling humiliated."
Try bashing it with a spoon love - if it really happened like that.
Surely if you saw someone getting their tadger out you would head for the door then, not wait for him to get a stonker on and then start polishing his helment?
Gawd give me strength. It is stupid claims like this that belittle the real problem like rape.
"She alleged he masturbated in front of her during a one-on-one script meeting in his apartment in 1989 and that she rushed out, feeling humiliated."
Try bashing it with a spoon love - if it really happened like that.
Surely if you saw someone getting their tadger out you would head for the door then, not wait for him to get a stonker on and then start polishing his helment?
// Or dont we bother with Juries now we have TwitFace?//
yeah I had noticed that - dont bother with a court case - the allegation will suffice to establish guilt
( oh sociotolblists will say that the guilt finding process has moved from the court room onto social media. Happened before - in the Terror ( 1794 ) being arrested meant you were gonna be guillotined. )
Moved into Medicine as well - in Amerikee anyway - depressing editorial in the New England Journal about a web site where doctors can complain that the Yankee equiv of Sir Launcelot Sprat felt their bottoms at a staff party in 1935
yeah I had noticed that - dont bother with a court case - the allegation will suffice to establish guilt
( oh sociotolblists will say that the guilt finding process has moved from the court room onto social media. Happened before - in the Terror ( 1794 ) being arrested meant you were gonna be guillotined. )
Moved into Medicine as well - in Amerikee anyway - depressing editorial in the New England Journal about a web site where doctors can complain that the Yankee equiv of Sir Launcelot Sprat felt their bottoms at a staff party in 1935