ChatterBank0 min ago
Is It Now Time For Ukip To Call It A Day?
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -politi cs-4276 7657
I don't think there's any point in the party existing, apart from giving us a laugh.
Without looking at their website, can anyone name five of their policies?
I don't think there's any point in the party existing, apart from giving us a laugh.
Without looking at their website, can anyone name five of their policies?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Danny....if only it was as simple as that ! Farage was all over the shop in the interview with Humphrys, and contradicted himself for the LBC interview that he gave less than 24 hours ago.
We have become used to wide spread coherency and confusion from UKIP over the years, but this is getting ridiculous !
UKIP is facing important local Elections in a few weeks time, and yet the image that is being presented to their potential voters is of a political Party falling apart at the seams, with everybody jumping ship.
We have become used to wide spread coherency and confusion from UKIP over the years, but this is getting ridiculous !
UKIP is facing important local Elections in a few weeks time, and yet the image that is being presented to their potential voters is of a political Party falling apart at the seams, with everybody jumping ship.
I think a lot of the problem with groups like UKIP is that in a party that claims to speak for "the people", as "the people" actually speak with many voices, there are a lot of oddballs who think their version of reality is the best one for the party. There were quite a few candidates for the leadership last time out, and Bolton only got around 30% of the vote, but more than anyone else. They reallly need to have a run-off between the top two candidates, to let off a bit more stram. Consolation for the loser would probably be he/she would be likely to get another go soon enough :-)
Here is a list of UKIP's "front" bench, who have resigned due to Bolton. (I am not expecting anybody to have heard of them )
Margot Parker, Ex-Deputy Leader
John Bickley, Ex-Immigration spokesman
William Dartmouth, Ex-trade and industry spokesman
Mike Hookem, Ex-Assistant Leader
Tim Aker, Ex Local Government spokesman
Peter Whittle, Ex-London spokesman
Garard Batten, Ex-Brexit spokesman
David Kurten, Ex-Education spokesman
So... my question is....in the immediate future, and in the run up up the local Elections, who is going to answer questions on any of the subjects in the above areas, and give UKIPs position ?
Margot Parker, Ex-Deputy Leader
John Bickley, Ex-Immigration spokesman
William Dartmouth, Ex-trade and industry spokesman
Mike Hookem, Ex-Assistant Leader
Tim Aker, Ex Local Government spokesman
Peter Whittle, Ex-London spokesman
Garard Batten, Ex-Brexit spokesman
David Kurten, Ex-Education spokesman
So... my question is....in the immediate future, and in the run up up the local Elections, who is going to answer questions on any of the subjects in the above areas, and give UKIPs position ?
Mikey4444
You keep banging on about this none parliamentary party, but said very little when Labour members of parliament were leaving like rats from a sinking ship, when that commie leader of yours came on the scene.
You are also saying that he should ditch his 'racist' girlfriend, had it been his wife would you be demanding that he divorced her for her own personal opinions?
You keep banging on about this none parliamentary party, but said very little when Labour members of parliament were leaving like rats from a sinking ship, when that commie leader of yours came on the scene.
You are also saying that he should ditch his 'racist' girlfriend, had it been his wife would you be demanding that he divorced her for her own personal opinions?
AOG - // You are also saying that he should ditch his 'racist' girlfriend, had it been his wife would you be demanding that he divorced her for her own personal opinions? //
Not really a fair comparison is it?
A man can date someone for a short time, and not be aware that she holds repugnant views different to his own.
However, if he is in a relationship deeply enough to be married, then it would be reasonable to assume that basics like attitudes to black people would have been discussed some time ago, and agreed / agreed to differ, but at least known, and not an unpleasant and damaging surprise.
Not really a fair comparison is it?
A man can date someone for a short time, and not be aware that she holds repugnant views different to his own.
However, if he is in a relationship deeply enough to be married, then it would be reasonable to assume that basics like attitudes to black people would have been discussed some time ago, and agreed / agreed to differ, but at least known, and not an unpleasant and damaging surprise.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.