Donate SIGN UP

Should ‘Britain First’ Now Be Banned ?

Avatar Image
Gromit | 07:32 Fri 02nd Feb 2018 | News
156 Answers
With the conviction of Darren Osbourne, evidence in court shows he was radicalised by visiting the Britain First website over several weeks.
He then went on to kill someone in a terrorist attack, and injury scores of others.

// But the trigger for the attack was far-right internet propaganda he had become obsessed with over just a few weeks. //

// Police said the 48-year-old became radicalised in just three to four weeks, as evidence from devices he used show him reading posts by the former English Defence League leader Tommy Robinson, far-right group Britain First and other extremists. //

Surely this shows that Britain First crosses the line from being a genuine protest group, and firmly places them in the position that they encourage terrorism, and indoctrinate gullible fools to commit murder.

Many muslim groups have been proscribed for less. They are on par with Scottish Dawn and should be treated similarly.
Gravatar

Answers

141 to 156 of 156rss feed

First Previous 5 6 7 8

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Talbot - // It's all very confusing this 'I always leave at the first sign of trouble, at the same time as I always help a damson in distress or (what is a male damson?) a helpless male for that matter //

I posted my answer to this question at 18:53 - feel free to re-read it.

If you are confused, I am unable to help you, I have explained it as clearly as I can, and re-writing it is obviously not going to make it any clearer for you, so I am not going to pursue this line of exchange any further, because we are getting nowhere.
Make that 18:43.
I think I've got it now.

You will always stop a woman ( or man) from being on the receiving end of violence ... except for when you have already left because you always leave the mere scent of violence.


Talbot - if that version makes you happy, let's go with that shall we.

You see, what you singularly fail to grasp is, I really don't care tuppence what you think about my attitudes to bravery / violence / chivalry / the price of fish is.

If you want to think I am an angel in human form, or a rank coward who deserves to be shot at dawn, think away, I absolutely do not care.

Hopefully this is the end of this nonsense now.
I'll sleep on it.
Like I say, that's the difference between us - you have to sleep on it to make a decision, my decision was made at 22:09 and one second.
Ah ... So despite you saying
''Hopefully this is the end of this nonsense now.''

You carried on, why am I not surprised ... smiley face and lol
Because I love having the last word.
Silence is sometimes better than having the last word.
The one who needs the last word is usually the one who came off worst in the discussion.
Garaman - I said I love having the last word, I didn't say I needed to have it.
I know what you wrote, Andy. People can decide for themselves whether they think 'love' or 'need' the more appropriate.
Garaman - // I know what you wrote, Andy. People can decide for themselves whether they think 'love' or 'need' the more appropriate. //

Let me think for a moment - is my life altered in any meaningful way, if people who think as you do think I need the last word or not?

That would be a no then.
Word (last one)
Not quite !
Never say never

141 to 156 of 156rss feed

First Previous 5 6 7 8

Do you know the answer?

Should ‘Britain First’ Now Be Banned ?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.