Donate SIGN UP

Answers

21 to 40 of 46rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
If we know he's a commie why is he leading the Labour party? They are not ideologically the same. I always said he's an infiltrator.
So a Tory newspaper once again attacks a socialist (look it up) leader with an unfounded story.
Telling me the Daily Express are still running Diana stories next.
Tony Blair created a faux Labour Party.
He stuffed it full of socialist-lite members leaving those properly of the left without a party which fully represented their core-beliefs.
Once the pantomine dame of 'New Labour' had left the stage the understudies rushed to fill the void with promises of being a proper alternative to the Tories.
And so we now have what we have ....
I don't think Corbyn was ever a "spy"
Sounds like he unwittingly, naively like many) gave info to a Czechoslovak who was an intelligence operative. As many were.
(I suspect that this is what may turn out to have been the case in the Trump enquiry too: naive conniving with hostile agents).

None of which means I think Corbyn is in any way suitable to lead a political party in the UK.
The Labour Party has consistently elected leaders who are unelectable as Prime Ministers - Kinnock, Foot, Miliband, Brown, and now we have Corbyn.

It's as though they have a built-in political death wish.

I do believe that Corbyn will not be the leader by the time the next election comes around - he increasingly damns his own chances with the sort of fanciful election pledges that only a confirmed loser-in-advance would offer, and the parliamentary party will have to replace him to look even vaguely credible at election time.
And that is the best answer Andy. ^
yeah bang on Andy.
Johnny 7. The article gives plenty of evidence.
Brown would have been electable as leader. The timing was poor :-)
not in a month of sundays
Who would be Labour leader if Corbyn wasn't..

Hmm. Oh I know. Someone chosen by Momentum and the Unions.
what about Keir Stamer.
As previously said: Starmer is probably unelectable. As leader.
Brown would almost certainly have won in 1997 had he not agreed to stand aside.
labour is not what it was if it ever was, it will always be i got mine jack..get yours, natural order of things i guess, all politoc's come and go, once their nest is fed taken care of, all liars..although i had hope in john smith before he passed away sadly, but there we.
i think the higher your up i the pile, they forget where they came from
and the needs of the people they represent, an after thought..
I think Keir Starmer is VERY electable. You can say what you like about the current Labour membership but they have a Golden Ticket if they oppose Brexit and Starmer will do that for them. for possibly the first time in history they will have a significant disenfranchised cross party vote, and could oust the Tories. I think that's about as electable as you're ever going to get.
kvalidir - What a sad indictment of our current political landscape - that the electorate would vote for Labour not because of what they represent - but because of what they don't represent.
I am not saying this because of her colour,I think that there is something that is weird about Dianne Abbott I can't explain thinking this I have this feeling that she is not the full shilling yet she is seemingly very clever
//there is something that is weird about Dianne Abbott I can't explain thinking this I have this feeling that she is not the full shilling\\

Understatement of the year.

21 to 40 of 46rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Could We Even Trust This Person To Be The Uk's Prime Minister?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.