News31 mins ago
What's Donald Trump Said About Guns And Gun Control?
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/av /world- us-cana da-4147 9161/wh at-s-do nald-tr ump-sai d-about -guns-a nd-gun- control
Here's another example of what a wassock Trump is....he used to be against the ownership of assault weapons, but now he advocates the carrying of weapons into night clubs by everybody. Hundreds of people have been injured or killed recently in America, but he still wants to hang on to that lovely dosh that the NRA gives him and other Republicans, rather than actually do something useful.
Let ABs Trumpettes defend him now.
Here's another example of what a wassock Trump is....he used to be against the ownership of assault weapons, but now he advocates the carrying of weapons into night clubs by everybody. Hundreds of people have been injured or killed recently in America, but he still wants to hang on to that lovely dosh that the NRA gives him and other Republicans, rather than actually do something useful.
Let ABs Trumpettes defend him now.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.//I will admit it will take time to roll back so much legislation in America. //
400 million guns estimated in the USA. They will never disappear.
//But Trump is doing nothing useful and will continue to do nothing.//
What did Obama do then, these shootings are nothign new? And what exactly do you expect him to do? It might be surprising to you but he has to favor the US voters not you and they even include the liberals and lefties who also have guns.
It's nothing to do with defending TRump more understanding that the US is not the UK.
400 million guns estimated in the USA. They will never disappear.
//But Trump is doing nothing useful and will continue to do nothing.//
What did Obama do then, these shootings are nothign new? And what exactly do you expect him to do? It might be surprising to you but he has to favor the US voters not you and they even include the liberals and lefties who also have guns.
It's nothing to do with defending TRump more understanding that the US is not the UK.
It is possible that half the American electorate whom you and Hillary deplore (or is it despise?) voted for Trump not because he is Trump, but because he is not Hillary or Obama?
Clinton and Obama are not on the side of the American people. Or if they are then only in the same sense that Merkel is on the side of the Germans.
Clinton and Obama are not on the side of the American people. Or if they are then only in the same sense that Merkel is on the side of the Germans.
VE...I am listening to a dissenting voice, and I don't agree with it !
Trump went after the Stopid vote, and was successful in getting most of them.
By the way, Trump is by no means a popular president. Only 55.7% of the possible population voted, and he got less than half of that.....so approx. only a few of the American voters, voted for him.
I asked you earlier if you supported Trumps view that everybody should go to night clubs with guns strapped on their waists or ankles. I see you haven't answered yet.
Trump went after the Stopid vote, and was successful in getting most of them.
By the way, Trump is by no means a popular president. Only 55.7% of the possible population voted, and he got less than half of that.....so approx. only a few of the American voters, voted for him.
I asked you earlier if you supported Trumps view that everybody should go to night clubs with guns strapped on their waists or ankles. I see you haven't answered yet.
mikey; An interesting article here by the estimable Pat Buchanan;
http:// takimag .com/ar ticle/t rump_mi ddle_am erican_ radical _patric k_bucha nan#axz z57T9k2 qtj
NFL in case you didn't know (and I didn't) is the National Football League
http://
NFL in case you didn't know (and I didn't) is the National Football League
Oh dear.
No, you didn't ask me (I'm starting from para 4 going back you understand), but, no, I wouldn't recommend that. Got it, Mikey?
But wasting my time, aren't I? There is a reason for Trump's being elected. You have a single explanation: stoopid. You lack the imagination to consider other possibilities.
Stick to opera, Mikey. I rather like Mikey the opera buff.
No, you didn't ask me (I'm starting from para 4 going back you understand), but, no, I wouldn't recommend that. Got it, Mikey?
But wasting my time, aren't I? There is a reason for Trump's being elected. You have a single explanation: stoopid. You lack the imagination to consider other possibilities.
Stick to opera, Mikey. I rather like Mikey the opera buff.
Beg pardon...I thought I had....so that is one Trump policy that you don't agree with then.
But I am pointing out that "half" of America didn't vote for Trump, which was your assertion earlier. A lot less than half voted for Trump. The majority either didn't vote, or if they did, they voted for Clinton.
America's politics works very differently from most other democracies, in that the less popular person can end up winning.
If we had the same situation over here, Labour could have won the Election in 2017 !
But I am pointing out that "half" of America didn't vote for Trump, which was your assertion earlier. A lot less than half voted for Trump. The majority either didn't vote, or if they did, they voted for Clinton.
America's politics works very differently from most other democracies, in that the less popular person can end up winning.
If we had the same situation over here, Labour could have won the Election in 2017 !
Garaman...it is indeed possible....my comparison wasn't really meant to be taken seriously !
But in America, the ED system ensures that the less popular candidate can win, which seems counter-intuitive to me.
Also, with such a low turn-out to their Elections, any candidate elected will seem to have little validity.
55.7% seems terribly low, especially when compared to Britain, where in 2017, the turn-out was 68.8%.
But in America, the ED system ensures that the less popular candidate can win, which seems counter-intuitive to me.
Also, with such a low turn-out to their Elections, any candidate elected will seem to have little validity.
55.7% seems terribly low, especially when compared to Britain, where in 2017, the turn-out was 68.8%.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.