Quizzes & Puzzles6 mins ago
We Are All In This Together, Or Just Another Worthless Political Correct Exercise?
49 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Is it possible that the Army needs to try harder because joining that particular enterprise is seen as less attractive than just about anything else ? So they try anything and everything to spice it up and beautify it. youngmaflob is correct, no matter how unpalatable hearing it may be for some.
A question I have been grappling with for a long time resurfaces. The received wisdom among many is that militant Muslims arrange to position themselves so they can indoctrinate children/youth at madrassas (a madrassa is a word used simply for a school in Arabic, not necessarily religious) and that the aim is to turn them into fighters against whomever they perceive as their enemies. The British military recently announced that they are going to increase their campaign of recruiting Cadets at schools in the UK - clearly in order to create a positive image of the military among children/youth (and their potentially joining).
I talked our son out of considering joining the Cadets at school (well, I basically politely forbade it) but his son is in there, much to my horror and my son is not greatly impressed - the parents are separated and my son has limited influence.
In principle, so far as the fundamental aim and the means toward it are concerned, what is the difference between the two recruiters (except "We" are better/holier than "They" - hold on, what IS the difference ?)?
A question I have been grappling with for a long time resurfaces. The received wisdom among many is that militant Muslims arrange to position themselves so they can indoctrinate children/youth at madrassas (a madrassa is a word used simply for a school in Arabic, not necessarily religious) and that the aim is to turn them into fighters against whomever they perceive as their enemies. The British military recently announced that they are going to increase their campaign of recruiting Cadets at schools in the UK - clearly in order to create a positive image of the military among children/youth (and their potentially joining).
I talked our son out of considering joining the Cadets at school (well, I basically politely forbade it) but his son is in there, much to my horror and my son is not greatly impressed - the parents are separated and my son has limited influence.
In principle, so far as the fundamental aim and the means toward it are concerned, what is the difference between the two recruiters (except "We" are better/holier than "They" - hold on, what IS the difference ?)?
The army is trying to promote the notion that soldiers respect and support each other, regardless of religious differences.
Personally, I would have more of an issue with the dichotomy of putting your gun down while you pray as a Christian.
Surely there is a conflict of faith there, when you take time out from shooting at people to say prayers to a God which is based on peace and love?
Personally, I would have more of an issue with the dichotomy of putting your gun down while you pray as a Christian.
Surely there is a conflict of faith there, when you take time out from shooting at people to say prayers to a God which is based on peace and love?
I think it's important to view the whole of the campaign, then you can compare and contrast each topic raised.
https:/ /www.ca mpaignl ive.co. uk/arti cle/bri tish-ar my-this -belong ing-201 8-karma rama/14 54470
https:/
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.