Quizzes & Puzzles6 mins ago
Far Too Lenient Sentence For Animal Cruelty- What Do Others Think
29 Answers
I am quite frankly appalled at the pathetic sentence that was handed down to this vicious person. He should never be allowed to have an animal again in his life never mind a 4 year ban and 4 months prison, it is unduly lenient
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -scotla nd-glas gow-wes t-43112 967
http://
Answers
You do wonder about the logic of a four year ban. I mean is it likely that anyone capable of beating a dog unconscious and throwing it into a road is EVER going to be a fit person to keep an animal?
11:36 Tue 20th Feb 2018
Email your MP via the link here. It might help to get the proposed changed to legislation pushed through faster:
http:// notfunn y.batte rsea.or g.uk/
https:/ /www.go v.uk/go vernmen t/news/ sentenc es-for- animal- cruelty -to-inc rease-t enfold- to-five -years
http://
https:/
In a previous life I was a community service supervisor (probation service) There was a guy who was doing 240hrs for tying a brick to a puppy's neck and throwing it in the local pond. It got free, so he kicked it to death. He also took his 10yr old son to a slaughter house and allowed him to kill a calf.
He was an absolute a/hole and I could have gleefully throttled him. I later looked at his file and noticed he'd got previous for child abuse. They say it's quite common for animal and child cruelty to be linked.
He was an absolute a/hole and I could have gleefully throttled him. I later looked at his file and noticed he'd got previous for child abuse. They say it's quite common for animal and child cruelty to be linked.
The maximum possible sentence for this offence is 6 months plus a fine
Animal cruelty (Revised 2017)
Animal Welfare Act 2006, s.4 (unnecessary suffering), s.8 (fighting etc), s.9 (breach of duty of person responsible for animal to ensure welfare)
Effective from: 24 April 2017
Triable only summarily
Maximum: Unlimited fine and/or 6 months
Offence range: Band A fine – 26 weeks’ custody
So he got near the maximum possible. If he had pleaded guilty that would have meant an automatic 1/3rd off the sentence, so 6 months becomes 4 months.
Animal cruelty (Revised 2017)
Animal Welfare Act 2006, s.4 (unnecessary suffering), s.8 (fighting etc), s.9 (breach of duty of person responsible for animal to ensure welfare)
Effective from: 24 April 2017
Triable only summarily
Maximum: Unlimited fine and/or 6 months
Offence range: Band A fine – 26 weeks’ custody
So he got near the maximum possible. If he had pleaded guilty that would have meant an automatic 1/3rd off the sentence, so 6 months becomes 4 months.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.