She doesn't even own it so a five figure sum to lose something you don't own would seem like a lottery win to some people. But she values her garden more so good for her I say.
She's 97yo so i don't think a five figure sum would change her life for ever. And she probably didn't get to that grand old age by kpw-towing to anyone.
I'm on the 'Good for her' side of the argument. There will be a lot of disruption anyway and it would be worse with bulldozers etc. just a very few feet from her front door. The council spokesman implies that they can manage with the existing access, so no problem.
She is a council tenant so been assisted by the community for who knows how long now she is being awkward and preventing the building of 49 much needed homes.
Lets home the Governments new efforts to stop building issues and get new houses up sorts this sort of thing out too.
I am on the fence on this one (well not her fence obviously) but deskdiary and youngmb make convincing points, after all it's never been her land in the first place. She is rather lucky to have stayed in the same council property for 50 years.
No, she is not being awkward. She is 97 years old and has lived in the house for 50 years. Removing most of her front garden would be cruel and disrespectful of the old lady, who has the common sense to realise that a 5-figure sum in compensation is of no use to her at her age. She is NOT preventing the houses being built; she is just making them think a little more about access.
To those who are against this woman, would you like to live in a bungalow with vehicles going past two or three feet, possibly even less, from your front window?
Thousands of people live with traffic going past their window, they build houses like that all the time - however they always did. Take a walk through some villages - many of the old cottages open right onto the pavement with no front garden at all.